The safety and efficacy of spironolactone is uncertain in end-stage renal disease. We randomized 129 maintenance hemodialysis patients to placebo (n=51) or spironolactone 12.5 mg (n=27), 25 mg (n=26), or 50 mg (n=25) daily for 36 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dosage trial to assess safety, tolerability and feasibility and to explore cardiovascular efficacy. The primary safety endpoints were hyperkalemia (potassium > 6.5 mEq/L) and hypotension requiring emergency department visit or hospitalization. Diastolic function was assessed by Doppler echocardiography. 125 participants (97%) completed dose escalation, with no significant difference in permanent study drug discontinuation between the groups (27.5% in placebo versus 16.7% in the combined spironolactone groups and 28% in the 50 mg group). Hyperkalemia frequency was similar between spironolactone and placebo (0.49 versus 0.50 events per patient-year) but demonstrated a significant linear trend due primarily to an increased event rate at the 50 mg dose (0.89 events per patient-year). The primary hypotension outcome was infrequent and similar with spironolactone and placebo (0.11 versus 0 events per patient-year). Gynecomastia was rare and did not differ significantly between groups. Change in diastolic function was similar with spironolactone and placebo. Spironolactone appears safe in carefully monitored maintenance hemodialysis patients, but did not affect cardiovascular parameters in this small study. Hyperkalemia occurs more frequently as dosage increases to 50 mg daily.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431563PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spironolactone placebo
12
events patient-year
12
cardiovascular efficacy
8
spironolactone
8
efficacy spironolactone
8
placebo-controlled multiple
8
multiple dosage
8
dosage trial
8
maintenance hemodialysis
8
hemodialysis patients
8

Similar Publications

Systolic Blood Pressure and Pulse Pressure in Heart Failure: Pooled Participant-Level Analysis of 4 Trials.

J Am Coll Cardiol

November 2024

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Hypertension is common in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), and current guidelines recommend treating systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a target <130 mm Hg. However, data supporting treatment to this target are limited. Additionally, pulse pressure (PP), a marker of aortic stiffness, has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, but its prognostic impact in HFpEF has not been extensively studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To evaluate whether sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) enables the uptitration of spironolactone without increasing the risk of hyper- and hypokalemia in patients with heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF and HFmrEF) and moderate/severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) who developed hyperkalemia during treatment with suboptimal spironolactone dose.

Methods: The REGISTA-K is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial that examined the efficacy and safety of SZC in uptitrating spironolactone without the occurrence of hyperkalemia or hypokalemia. A total of 266 patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF and hyperkalemia will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SZC or placebo after treating hyperkalemia with SZC at 25 sites in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) on the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), sourcing data from various medical databases.
  • The analysis included 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients with heart or kidney disease, showing no significant increase in AKI risk when using MRAs (RR 1.13), but did find an increased risk of kidney injury overall (RR 1.52).
  • Specific MRAs like canrenone and spironolactone were linked to a higher risk of kidney injury, while eplerenone and finerenone did not appear to increase this risk, suggesting that the choice
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) like spironolactone are effective for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but are often underused due to hyperkalemia concerns.
  • The REALIZE-K trial tested the effects of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in helping patients with heart failure and hyperkalemia effectively use spironolactone.
  • Results showed that participants who received SZC had significantly better outcomes in terms of maintaining normal potassium levels and continuing on spironolactone compared to those on a placebo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

N Engl J Med

November 2024

From the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University (S.S.J., M.-A.E., S.F.L., R. Mian, J.T., S.R.M., P.J.D., J.E., T.S., D.C., S.T., S.Y.), and Hamilton Health Sciences (S.S.J., M.-A.E., S.F.L., R. Mian, S.R.M., P.J.D., J.E., T.S., D.C.), Hamilton, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke (M.-A.E.), the University of British Columbia and Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver (J.A.C.), the Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (W.T.), and London Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London (S.L.) - all in Canada; the University Clinic of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia (S.K., B.Z.); Sorbonne University, ACTION Study Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris (G.M.); the Dutch Network for Cardiovascular Research, Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, and Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar - all in the Netherlands (J.H.C.); the University Clinical Center of Serbia and the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade (G.S.); the Cardiology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid (R. Moreno); NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and the Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield - both in Sheffield, United Kingdom (R.F.S.); the Caril and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education, Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati (T.D.H.); the Cardiology Division, Heart Center, Luzerner Kantonsspital, and the Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland (M.B.); University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (P.K.); the Department of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, and Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC - both in Australia (J.L.); the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, and the Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York (B.S.); and B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal (S.K.S.).

Article Synopsis
  • * A total of 7062 patients participated, and the results showed no significant difference in primary cardiovascular outcomes between the colchicine group (9.1%) and the placebo group (9.3%) over a 3-year follow-up period.
  • * Colchicine did lower C-reactive protein levels, indicating some anti-inflammatory effect, but it also caused more diarrhea compared to placebo, though serious infections were similar in both groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!