Aim: It is of critical importance to have internationally constructed tools to address early childhood development. The aim of this second phase of a two-phase study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in identifying developmental delay in four diverse countries.

Methods: The first phase of this 2011-2015 back-to-back study included 4949 children up to 42 months of age from primary healthcare centres in Argentina, India, South Africa and Turkey. Distribution curves were generated to show the ages when the children attained GMCD milestones and those that could be used across sexes and countries were placed in age ranges corresponding to the 85th and 97th percentile point estimates. Phase two examined a separately recruited sample of children in those countries to determine sensitivity and specificity of the GMCD.

Results: The validation phase of the 85 milestones in the GMCD identified delayed development in 30% of the 1731 children in the four countries. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.71-0.94 and 0.69-0.82, respectively, for the total sample and the different age groups.

Conclusion: The GMCD standardised in four diverse countries has appropriate accuracy for identification of children with developmental delay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6520130PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.14661DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensitivity specificity
16
guide monitoring
8
monitoring child
8
child development
8
diverse countries
8
developmental delay
8
children countries
8
countries
5
children
5
validation international
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!