AI Article Synopsis

  • Clinical reactions to bony fish allergies are primarily caused by β-parvalbumins, while the allergenicity of α-parvalbumins found in cartilaginous fish like rays and sharks is not well understood.
  • Researchers investigated whether individuals allergic to bony fish also exhibit reactivity to rays, using various testing methods to assess sensitization and clinical responses.
  • The study found that most patients tolerated rays, indicating their lower allergenicity compared to bony fish, suggesting that cartilaginous fish could be a safe dietary alternative for those with bony fish allergies.

Article Abstract

Background: Clinical reactions to bony fish species are common in patients with allergy to fish and are caused by parvalbumins of the β-lineage. Cartilaginous fish such as rays and sharks contain mainly α-parvalbumins and their allergenicity is not well understood.

Objective: To investigate the allergenicity of cartilaginous fish and their α-parvalbumins in individuals allergic to bony fish.

Methods: Sensitization to cod, salmon, and ray among patients allergic to cod, salmon, or both (n = 18) was explored by prick-to-prick testing. Clinical reactivity to ray was assessed in 11 patients by food challenges or clinical workup. IgE-binding to β-parvalbumins (cod, carp, salmon, barramundi, tilapia) and α-parvalbumins (ray, shark) was determined by IgE-ELISA. Basophil activation tests and skin prick tests were performed with β-parvalbumins from cod, carp, and salmon and α-parvalbumins from ray and shark.

Results: Tolerance of ray was observed in 10 of 11 patients. Prick-to-prick test reactions to ray were markedly lower than to bony fish (median wheal diameter 2 mm with ray vs 11 mm with cod and salmon). IgE to α-parvalbumins was lower (median, 0.1 kU/L for ray and shark) than to β-parvalbumins (median, ≥1.65 kU/L). Furthermore, α-parvalbumins demonstrated a significantly reduced basophil activation capacity compared with β-parvalbumins (eg, ray vs cod, P < .001; n = 18). Skin prick test further demonstrated lower reactivity to α-parvalbumins compared with β-parvalbumins.

Conclusions: Most patients allergic to bony fish tolerated ray, a cartilaginous fish, because of low allergenicity of its α-parvalbumin. A careful clinical workup and in vitro IgE-testing for cartilaginous fish will improve patient management and may introduce an alternative to bony fish into patients' diet.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060078PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bony fish
16
cartilaginous fish
16
patients allergic
12
cod salmon
12
ray
11
fish
10
low allergenicity
8
allergic bony
8
clinical workup
8
β-parvalbumins cod
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!