A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Occupational risk for personnel working in veterinary clinics through exposure to vectors of rickettsial pathogens. | LitMetric

Occupational risk for personnel working in veterinary clinics through exposure to vectors of rickettsial pathogens.

Ticks Tick Borne Dis

Universidad Autónoma de Cd. Juárez (UACJ), Av. Plutarco Elias Calles 1210, Cd. Juárez, Chihuahua, 32310, Mexico. Electronic address:

Published: February 2019

Workers at veterinary clinics are exposed to zoonotic pathogens, which, though infrequently, can lead to serious consequences. The aim of the present study was to estimate the seroprevalence for rickettsial pathogens in veterinary clinic personnel in Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico. Voluntary participants included 106 veterinarians, 19 pet groomers, 36 veterinary assistants and 6 administrative workers who supplied blood samples taken by venipuncture. Detection of Rickettsia rickettsii, Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum was conducted by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. To determine risk factors for the seroprevalence, the study considered social, demographic and occupational variables as well as the clinical signs and symptoms of the participants. Logistic regression procedures were performed, and the odds ratio (OR) was calculated with confidence intervals corresponding to a probability of 95%. The results indicate that 54% of the participants had a positive seroreaction to at least one of the pathogens evaluated and 2% were positive to all. The coexposure was as follows: 3% to R. rickettsii and A. phagocytophilum, 9% to Ehrlichia spp. and A. phagocytophilum, and 2% to Ehrlichia spp. and R. rickettsii. It was established that grooming posed the highest risk for R. rickettsii exposure. The implementation of appropriate management practices for zoonotic diseases is recommended to avoid health problems that may be life threatening to personnel in veterinary clinics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.10.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

veterinary clinics
12
ehrlichia spp
12
rickettsial pathogens
8
phagocytophilum ehrlichia
8
veterinary
5
occupational risk
4
risk personnel
4
personnel working
4
working veterinary
4
clinics exposure
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!