The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint.

Background: Various causes for bone defects of the lower jaw have been described. As a result, patients often suffer from compromised aesthetics and a loss of, or reduction in, important physiological functions, such as swallowing, breathing, and speaking. A change in the shape of the lower jaw can impair the natural occlusion and leads to an atypical or modified position of the temporomandibular joint. Titanium reconstruction plates are the standard approach to jaw reconstruction, and are used for temporary bridging of a jaw defect or fixation of a bone graft. Conventionally these plates are intraoperatively adjusted to the mandible by the surgeon. Computer-aided manufacturing, computer-aided design, and rapid prototyping have gained increasing importance in the field of medicine, as they allow the production of individual models of the lower jaw, with the possibility of preoperatively bending the reconstruction plates. In this retrospective study, the accuracy of pre-bent titanium plates and their effect on the temporomandibular joint situation in comparison with intraoperatively curved plates will be discussed.

Materials And Methods: Patients who attended our department for lower jaw reconstruction between March 2013 and February 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Within that time 20 patients were treated with pre-bent reconstruction plates (group 1). 20 comparable patients were selected with reconstruction and conventional intraoperative bending (group 2). To evaluate the accuracy of the plates and the condylar position, postoperative cone beam computed tomograms and computed tomograms were used to assess the bone-plate distance at 12 defined points and four angles in axial reconstruction. The results were compared, statistically evaluated, and discussed.

Results: Regarding the maximum bone-plate distances and the sum of distances, there was a significant difference between the accuracy of the pre-bent and the conventionally bent reconstruction plates (p = 0.022, p = 0.048). Regarding the condylar position, there was no significant difference between both methods (p = 0.867).

Conclusion: The results of this study show that a better fitting accuracy can be achieved using pre-bent plates. Preparation of the plates proves to be advantageous and meaningful, especially in complex bone defects and deformations of the lower jaw. Nevertheless, concerning the position of the temporomandibular joint, no significant difference could be ascertained between the shown methods, contradicting several studies.