AI Article Synopsis

  • A study compared unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in treating lumbar degenerative diseases, focusing on outcomes like fusion rate and recovery metrics.
  • After analyzing data from 12 randomized controlled trials with 808 patients, findings indicated that both fixation methods had similar fusion rates but differed in blood loss and surgical duration.
  • Unilateral fixation was found to reduce total blood loss and operation time but was associated with a higher rate of cage migration compared to bilateral fixation.

Article Abstract

Background: To investigate whether unilateral pedicle screw fixation is superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to August 2018 were searched. All the high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical controlled studies comparing the unilateral pedicle screw fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases were enrolled in this study. Fusion rate was the main outcome. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis.

Results: Twelve RCTs including 808 patients (unilateral pedicle screw fixation = 393, bilateral pedicle screw fixation = 415) were included in our meta-analysis. There was a significant difference between unilateral pedicle screw fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in terms of the fusion rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95%CI [0.92, 1.00], P = 0.073), visual analog scale (VAS) at final follow-up, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association scores (JOA), short-form health survey (SF-36), and length of hospital stay. Compared with bilateral pedicle screw fixation, unilateral pedicle screw fixation was associated with a reduction of the total blood loss and operation time (P < 0.05). Unilateral pedicle screw fixation was associated with an increase of the cage migration than bilateral pedicle screw fixation (17.1% vs 7.1%, RR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.93; P = 0.017).

Conclusions: Unilateral pedicle screw fixation and bilateral pedicle screw fixation has similar fusion rate when treating for lumbar degenerative diseases. Our meta-analysis suggested that compared with bilateral pedicle screw fixation, unilateral pedicle screw fixation significantly reduced total blood loss and operation time for lumbar degenerative diseases. The use of unilateral pedicle screw for lumbar degenerative diseases increases the cage migration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249771PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1004-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pedicle screw
48
screw fixation
40
unilateral pedicle
24
bilateral pedicle
24
screw
12
fixation lumbar
12
lumbar degenerative
12
pedicle
11
fixation
10
fixation superior
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!