A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of different methods of securing cellophane bands for portosystemic shunt attenuation. | LitMetric

Evaluation of different methods of securing cellophane bands for portosystemic shunt attenuation.

Vet Surg

Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Published: January 2019

Objective: To compare mechanisms of and pressures at failure of 4 methods of securing 2 types of cellophane bands around a vein.

Study Design: Ex vivo mechanical evaluation.

Methods: Cellophane bands composed of 3 or 4 layers were applied around a cadaveric external jugular vein (EJV) to create 25% or 50% attenuation. These bands were secured with a medium or medium-large polymer locking ligation clip (PLLC), or a medium or medium-large titanium ligation clip (TLC). Sterile saline 0.9% was instilled into the lumen of the EJV until a pressure of 100 mm Hg was reached. Failure mechanism and luminal pressure at failure were compared between groups.

Results: Medium clips failed less often than medium-large clips (P < .001) and consistently sustained 100 mm Hg without failing. Three-layer cellophane bands were 4.1 times more likely to fail than 4-layer bands (P = .003, CI 1.6-10.2) and failed at lower pressures (28.32 ± 3.59 mm Hg and 44.81 ± 6.51 mm Hg, respectively, P = .027). Failure rates of the cellophane band constructs did not differ whether secured with PLLC or with TLC (P = .635) or with 25% vs 50% attenuation (P = .780).

Conclusion: A single medium clip withstood physiological forces and secured a cellophane band at up to 50% attenuation. A 3-layer cellophane band was more likely to fail compared with a 4-layer cellophane band.

Clinical Significance: These ex vivo results provide evidence to support the application of a 4-layer cellophane band secured with a single medium PLLC or TLC for portosystemic shunt attenuation. A single medium PLLC should be used to eliminate computed tomography artifacts during postoperative evaluation of shunt closure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cellophane bands
12
methods securing
8
medium medium-large
8
ligation clip
8
evaluation methods
4
securing cellophane
4
bands
4
bands portosystemic
4
portosystemic shunt
4
shunt attenuation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!