We compared the in vitro antimicrobial activities of tedizolid and linezolid on the Sensititre broth microdilution system for Gram-positive cocci isolates (n=146) from skin and skin structure infections and bloodstream infections, bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum. These pathogens included 40 methicillin-resistant , 38 coagulase-negative staphylococci, 20 and 48 beta-haemolytic spp. Susceptibility was simultaneously determined for 48 vanA vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates 2013-2016 from rectal swabs (23 and 25 , of which 4 were linezolid-non-susceptible). MIC for tedizolid were fourfold to eightfold lower than linezolid on the Sensititre and ranged from 0.12 to 0.5 µg/mL for the different pathogen groups. All isolates were susceptible to tedizolid except two vanA strains (MICs of 1 and 2 µg/mL, respectively). Categorical and essential agreement for tedizolid were 99.48% and 92%, respectively, between Liofilchem gradient diffusion and Sensititre methods. Overall, the drug exhibited excellent activity against the surveyed Gram-positive pathogens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205473DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gram-positive pathogens
8
gradient diffusion
8
broth microdilution
8
linezolid sensititre
8
tedizolid
5
evaluation susceptibility
4
susceptibility gram-positive
4
pathogens tertiary
4
tertiary care
4
care hospital
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!