Organisational factors and mortality after an emergency laparotomy: multilevel analysis of 39 903 National Emergency Laparotomy Audit patients.

Br J Anaesth

UCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK; UCL Department of Applied Health Research, London, UK.

Published: December 2018

Background: Studies across healthcare systems have demonstrated between-hospital variation in survival after an emergency laparotomy. We postulate that this variation can be explained by differences in perioperative process delivery, underpinning organisational structures, and associated hospital characteristics.

Methods: We performed this nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study using data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit organisational and patient audit data sets. Outcome measures were all-cause 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for perioperative processes and organisational structures and characteristics by fitting multilevel logistic regression models.

Results: The cohort comprised 39 903 patients undergoing surgery at 185 hospitals. Controlling for case mix and clustering, a substantial proportion of between-hospital mortality variation was explained by differences in processes, infrastructure, and hospital characteristics. Perioperative care pathways [OR: 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.96; and OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.99] and emergency surgical units (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.80-0.99; and OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98) were associated with reduced 30- and 90-day mortality, respectively. In contrast, infrequent consultant-delivered intraoperative care was associated with increased 30- and 90-day mortality (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.01-2.56; and OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.08-2.39, respectively). Postoperative geriatric medicine review was associated with substantially lower mortality in older (≥70 yr) patients (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.29-0.42; and OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55-0.73, respectively).

Conclusions: This multicentre study identified low-technology, readily implementable structures and processes that are associated with improved survival after an emergency laparotomy. Key components of pathways, perioperative medicine input, and specialist units require further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emergency laparotomy
20
30- 90-day
12
089 95%
12
national emergency
8
laparotomy audit
8
survival emergency
8
variation explained
8
explained differences
8
organisational structures
8
95%
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Evidence to guide the application of damage control laparotomy (DCL) in emergency surgery patients is limited. We assessed whether DCL use for emergent small bowel or colon surgery increased over time and its impact on outcomes. We hypothesized that DCL would be utilized more often in patients with significant comorbidities or septic shock with improved outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a high-risk procedure, especially in frail patients. This study investigates the prevalence of frailty in referral facilities, evaluates the impact of frailty on postoperative morbidity and mortality, and assesses the long-term effect of EL on patients' functional status.

Methods: This prospective multicentre cohort study included patients aged 50 years and older who underwent EL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term impact of emergency laparotomy on health-related quality of life.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

January 2025

Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE), Department og Hepatic and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital- Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, 2730, Denmark.

Purpose: Emergency laparotomy can result in a range of physical and neuropsychiatric postoperative complaints, potentially impacting quality of life. This study aimed to assess the effect of emergency laparotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and how HRQoL influences the risk of readmission.

Method: HRQoL was assessed in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy during a 1-year period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Abdominal hemorrhage and vascular fragility associated with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Jpn J Radiol

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-machi, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.

We report a case of recurrent abdominal bleeding associated with vascular fragility in a 67-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed hemorrhagic ascites and a pseudoaneurysm of the sigmoid colon artery, which was suspected to be the source of bleeding. Emergency laparotomy confirmed extremely fragile vessels, requiring repeated surgeries for recurrent bleeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Preoperative assessment of risk for emergency laparotomy may enhance decision making with regards to urgency or perioperative critical care admission and promote a more informed consent process for patients. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the performance of risk assessment tools in predicting mortality after emergency laparotomy.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched to 12 February 2022 for observational studies reporting expected mortality based on a preoperative risk assessment and actual mortality after emergency laparotomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!