AI Article Synopsis

  • * An expert consultation followed by the Delphi method was used to discuss and assess these endpoints, revealing that over 80% of experts believe standardized endpoints are necessary, despite challenges in defining moderate severity.
  • * The research indicates a preference for aligning endpoints with WHO guidelines and suggests that careful validation using large data sets could enhance their effectiveness in dengue intervention research.

Article Abstract

Background: As increasing numbers of dengue vaccines and therapeutics are in clinical development, standardized consensus clinical endpoint definitions are urgently needed to assess the efficacy of different interventions with respect to disease severity. We aimed to convene dengue experts representing various sectors and dengue endemic areas to review the literature and propose clinical endpoint definitions for moderate and severe disease based on the framework provided by the WHO 2009 classification.

Methods: The endpoints were first proposed and discussed in a structured expert consultation. After that, the Delphi method was carried out to assess the usefulness, validity and feasibility of the standardized clinical disease endpoints for interventional dengue research.

Results: Most respondents (> 80%) agreed there is a need for both standardized clinical endpoints and operationalization of severe endpoints. Most respondents (67%) felt there is utility for moderate severity endpoints, but cited challenges in their development. Hospitalization as a moderate endpoint of disease severity or measure of public health impact was deemed to be useful by only 47% of respondents, but 89% felt it could bring about supplemental information if carefully contextualized according to data collection setting. Over half of the respondents favored alignment of the standard endpoints with the WHO guidelines (58%), but cautioned that the endpoints could have ramifications for public health practice. In terms of data granularity of the endpoints, there was a slight preference for a categorical vs numeric system (e.g. 1-10) (47% vs 34%), and 74% of respondents suggested validating the endpoints using large prospective data sets.

Conclusion: The structured consensus-building process was successful taking into account the history of the debate around potential endpoints for severe dengue. There is clear support for the development of standardized endpoints for interventional clinical research and the need for subsequent validation with prospective data sets. Challenges include the complexity of developing moderate disease research endpoints for dengue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6238344PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0601-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endpoints
13
clinical endpoints
8
endpoints dengue
8
development standardized
8
clinical endpoint
8
endpoint definitions
8
disease severity
8
standardized clinical
8
disease endpoints
8
endpoints interventional
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!