Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal abnormalities. Epidural corticosteroid injections (ESIs) have been used long time ago for treatment of lumbar radiculopathy or discogenic back pain in case of failed medical and conservative management. Different techniques for ESIs include the interlaminar, the caudal, and the transforaminal approaches.

Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare between the efficacy of infraneural transforaminal ESI and lumbar paramedian nerve root targeted interlaminar steroid injection in reduction of unilateral radicular pain secondary to disc prolapse.

Patients And Methods: This prospective double-blind randomized study was performed on 40 patients randomized into two equal groups, each of 20: the infraneural transforaminal ESI (IN group) and the interlaminar parasagittal ESI (IL group). Patients with backache without leg radiation, or with focal motor neurological deficit, previous spine surgery, S1 radiculopathy, lumbar ESI in the past month, systemic steroid used recently within 4 weeks before the procedure, allergy to any medication or addiction to opioids, and pregnancy were excluded from the study. The duration and efficacy of pain relief (defined as ≥40% reduction of pain perception) by 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) is the primary outcome. Functional assessment using Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) and possible side effects and complications are the secondary outcomes.

Results: The VAS and MODQ scores were significantly lower in both groups in comparison with the basal values. There was also a lower VAS in the infraneural group than the parasagittal (IL) group up to 6 months after injection.

Conclusion: The infraneural (IN) epidural steroid is more favorable than the parasagittal (IL) interlaminar epidural steroid owing to its long-term improvement in physical function than the parasagittal technique with no serious side effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180670PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_263_18DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infraneural transforaminal
12
nerve root
8
root targeted
8
transforaminal esi
8
esi group
8
side effects
8
epidural steroid
8
interlaminar
5
epidural
5
infraneural
5

Similar Publications

The Anatomy, Technique, Safety, and Efficacy of Image-Guided Epidural Access.

Radiol Clin North Am

March 2024

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address:

Epidural steroid injections have demonstrable efficacy and safety in treatment of radicular pain syndromes; transforaminal access has greater evidence of efficacy than interlaminar approaches. The interventionalist must understand epidural and foraminal anatomy and imaging to insure delivery of medication to the target, the ventral epidural space at the site of neural compression. This obligates pre-procedural planning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lumbosacral radicular pain is commonly treated by transforaminal steroid epidural injection. There are two methods: the supraneural and the infraneural approaches. The supraneural approach can result in rare but catastrophic consequences from injury to the radiculomedullary artery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

Pain Physician

January 2021

Vice Chair for Research and Education, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Clinical Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Surgery at University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.

Background: Transforaminal epidural injections have been used since the late 1990s to treat lumbar radicular pain. They have been the subject of considerable attention, with varying conclusions from systematic reviews as to their efficacy. Transforaminal injections have been associated with rare but major complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Kambin's triangle and the safe triangle are common posterolateral approaches for lumbar transforaminal endoscopic surgery and epidural injection. To date, no consensus has been reached on the optimal transforaminal approach, in particular its underlying anatomical mechanism. The aim of this study was to investigate the 3D architecture of the neurovascular and adipose zones in the upper and lower lumbar intervertebral foramina (IVFs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!