A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The influence of knowledge of performance endpoint on pacing strategies, perception of effort, and neural activity during 30-km cycling time trials. | LitMetric

It is understood that withholding information during exercise can alter performance during self-paced exercise, though less is known about neural activity during such exercise. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of withholding versus providing distance feedback on perception, muscular activation, and cerebral activity during cycling time trials (TT). Nine well-trained male cyclists randomly completed 2 x 30-km TT, with provision of performance information and distance feedback (known; KTT), and without performance information and remaining distance (unknown; UTT). Prefrontal cortex (PFC) hemoglobin concentration, electroencephalogy (EEG) responses of the parietal lobe (PL) and motor cortex (MC), and surface electromyogram (EMG) of the right thigh were monitored throughout the TTs, in addition to heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and power output (PO). Time to completion was shorter for the KTT compared to UTT (51.04 ± 3.26 vs. 49.25 ± 3.57 min, P = 0.01). There were no differences evident for RPE between conditions (P > 0.50). However, during the final 2 km, the KTT presented higher PO (P ≤ 0.05), HR (P = 0.03) and MC, and PL EEG activity (d = 0.51-0.71) in addition to increased tissue hemoglobin index (nTHI) and oxygen extraction (HHb) (d = 0.55-0.65) compared to the UTT. In conclusion, when withholding information pertaining to remaining distance, performance was reduced due to the application of a conservative pacing strategy. In addition, the increase in HHb across the PFC was strongly correlated with PO (r = 0.790; P < 0.001) suggesting knowledge about remaining distance may increase activation across the PFC. Further, it appears that changes within the PFC may play a role in the regulation of cycling performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234147PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13892DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neural activity
8
cycling time
8
time trials
8
distance feedback
8
remaining distance
8
compared utt
8
performance
5
influence knowledge
4
knowledge performance
4
performance endpoint
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!