The relative efficacy of mindfulness versus distraction: The moderating role of attentional bias.

Eur J Pain

Clinical Psychology Department, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Published: April 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored how quickly individuals could disengage from pain-related stimuli and how this affected their response to mindfulness-based interventions compared to distraction techniques during a cold pressor test.
  • Participants who underwent the mindfulness-based interoceptive exposure task (MIET) experienced a higher pain threshold and improved tolerance compared to those in distraction and control groups, although their distress levels were similar to the control group.
  • Difficulty in disengaging from pain-related words impacted the effectiveness of mindfulness versus distraction strategies, with those who could not disengage quickly benefiting less from the mindfulness approach.

Article Abstract

Background: This study investigated whether the ability to disengage quickly from pain-related stimuli moderated the relative efficacy of a mindfulness-based intervention versus distraction in response to an experimental pain task.

Methods: Participants (n = 100) completed a dot probe task with eye tracking and were then randomized (2:2:1) to receive a mindfulness-based interoceptive exposure task (MIET), distraction instructions or no instructions (control group) before engaging in the cold pressor test.

Results: Participants who were allocated to the MIET condition reported a significantly higher pain threshold and distress than the distraction group, although not significantly higher than the control group. Those in the MIET group had improved tolerance compared to both the distraction and control groups. Difficulty disengaging from pain-related stimuli, as measured by the duration of the first fixation on sensory words, was found to moderate the relative efficacy of mindfulness versus distraction in terms of pain threshold and distress, but not tolerance. Those with difficulty disengaging from sensory pain words benefited less from the MIET. Duration of first fixation on sensory and affective pain words were highly correlated, and duration of first fixation on affective pain words also moderated the relative efficacy of MIET and distraction on threshold, but not distress.

Conclusions: These results show that a single brief session of a mindfulness task was sufficient to change an acute pain experience in comparison with a distraction task, and that those who disengaged quickly from pain words benefited most.

Significance: This study demonstrated the efficacy of a novel, exposure-based mindfulness technique for pain tolerance and showed that those who disengaged easily from pain stimuli benefited most. This brief task could be clinically useful, particularly for those who are not overly focused on their pain symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1340DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

relative efficacy
16
versus distraction
12
duration fixation
12
pain
11
efficacy mindfulness
8
mindfulness versus
8
distraction
8
pain-related stimuli
8
moderated relative
8
miet distraction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!