A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Advanced Dietary Patterns Analysis Using Sparse Latent Factor Models in Young Adults. | LitMetric

Background: Principal components analysis (PCA) has been the most widely used method for deriving dietary patterns to date. However, PCA requires arbitrary ad hoc decisions for selecting food variables in interpreting dietary patterns and does not easily accommodate covariates. Sparse latent factor models can be utilized to address these issues.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare Bayesian sparse latent factor models with PCA for identifying dietary patterns among young adults.

Methods: Habitual food intake was estimated in 2730 sedentary young adults from the Training Interventions and Genetics of Exercise Response (TIGER) Study [aged 18-35 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2): 26.5 ± 6.1] who exercised <30 min/wk during the previous 30 d without restricting caloric intake before study enrollment. A food-frequency questionnaire was used to generate the frequency intakes of 102 food items. Sparse latent factor modeling was applied to the standardized food intakes to derive dietary patterns, incorporating additional covariates (sex, race/ethnicity, and BMI). The identified dietary patterns via sparse latent factor modeling were compared with the PCA derived dietary patterns.

Results: Seven dietary patterns were identified in both PCA and sparse latent factor analysis. In contrast to PCA, the sparse latent factor analysis allowed the covariate information to be jointly accounted for in the estimation of dietary patterns in the model and offered probabilistic criteria to determine the foods relevant to each dietary pattern. The derived patterns from both methods generally described common dietary behaviors. Dietary patterns 1-4 had similar food subsets using both statistical approaches, but PCA had smaller sets of foods with more cross-loading elements between the 2 factors. Overall, the sparse latent factor analysis produced more interpretable dietary patterns, with fewer of the food items excluded from all patterns.

Conclusion: Sparse latent factor models can be useful in future studies of dietary patterns by reducing the intrinsic arbitrariness involving the choice of food variables in interpreting dietary patterns and incorporating covariates in the assessment of dietary patterns.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280002PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy188DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dietary patterns
16
sparse latent
12
latent factor
12
factor models
12
young adults
8
advanced dietary
4
patterns
4
patterns analysis
4
analysis sparse
4
models young
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!