[Comparative functional outcome of reverse shoulder prostheses implanted on degenerative and oncological indications].

Introduction: Several methods (bone graft, endoprosthesis) are used to reconstruct proximal humerus resections due to primary and metastatic tumours. One of the new procedures is the replacement of the joint surfaces and the removed proximal humerus end with reverse shoulder prosthesis, optionally supplemented with bone implantation (composite procedure) in the hope of achieving better shoulder function.

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the shoulder function of the patient group operated by the above procedure with reverse prosthesis to a patient group operated by indication of degenerative shoulder disease (rotator cuff arthropathy).

Method: The study involved 23 patients (13 men, 10 women) who were operated between 2012 and 2016 in our institution. Among them, 15 had rotator cuff arthropathy indication of reverse prosthesis, while in 8 cases, resection of the humerus and prosthesis implantation were performed due to tumour lesions. The average age of our patients was 62.5 years (17-82) and the average follow-up was 23.5 months (5-57). We performed physical examination, X-ray pictures on their operated arm, and data were recorded and analysed based on functional score systems.

Results: The level of postoperative pain was almost the same in the two groups, but only the rotator cuff arthropathy group needed pain medications. In line with our expectations, we received slightly lower values by each of the three scoring systems in case of tumorous patients. The tumorous patients were satisfied with the results achieved.

Conclusions: Following proximal humerus resections, reversed prosthesis implantation with occasional bone allografts is a reliable method of reconstruction, which approaches available functions and reliability as compared to non-tumour-indicating patients. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(45): 1838-1843.