Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm Diagnosed during Exploratory Laparoscopy for a Presumed Pelvic Mass.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.

Published: January 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study presents a surgical video demonstrating laparoscopic treatment for an appendiceal mass that was initially misidentified as a pelvic mass in a 53-year-old woman.
  • The procedure involved extensive imaging and laparoscopic exploration, eventually revealing the cystic structure to be an appendiceal mass, which was successfully removed without complications.
  • The findings suggest that medical professionals should include appendiceal masses in their differential diagnosis when patients present with similar pelvic symptoms.

Article Abstract

Study Objective: To demonstrate a surgical video of laparoscopic management of an appendiceal mass preoperatively misdiagnosed as a pelvic mass. This study was deemed to be exempt from the Yale New Haven Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Design: A step-by-step explanation of the diagnosis and laparoscopic management of an appendiceal mass using an instructive video (Canadian Task Force classification III).

Setting: A teaching hospital in New Haven, Connecticut.

Patient: A 53-year-old multiparous perimenopausal woman.

Intervention: Laparoscopic management of an appendiceal mass.

Measurements And Main Results: A 53-year-old multiparous perimenopausal patient underwent workup for pelvic pain. Pelvic imaging revealed a 72 × 35 × 28 mm cystic structure abutting the uterine fundus with thin partial septum but no mural nodules or concomitant pelvic lymphadenopathy. Exploratory laparoscopy showed unremarkable pelvic anatomy. After the entire small bowel was run, the cystic structure abutting the uterine fundus was deemed to be an appendiceal mass. The observed convergence of the 3 taeniae coli at the junction of the cecum with the cystic mass confirmed the diagnosis. For laparoscopic resection the umbilical fold port site was extended to 12 mm to introduce the Endo GIA stapler (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The appendiceal mass was stabilized in view with a laparoscopic grasper, and the stapler was articulated to fit the base of the appendix without narrowing the lumen of the cecum. The specimens were removed through the umbilical port site in a laparoscopic bag without spillage. Pathology returned low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with no evidence of invasion. The patient was managed appropriately with laparoscopic appendectomy and discharged home on the day of surgery.

Conclusion: Appendiceal masses should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a presumed pelvic mass. For low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms that are diagnosed intraoperatively, laparoscopic resection without spillage or rupture is a feasible and appropriate approach for treatment [1-3].

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

appendiceal mass
16
low-grade appendiceal
12
appendiceal mucinous
12
pelvic mass
12
laparoscopic management
12
management appendiceal
12
mucinous neoplasm
8
exploratory laparoscopy
8
presumed pelvic
8
mass
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!