Comparison of RT-qPCR and Nanostring in the measurement of blood interferon response for the diagnosis of type I interferonopathies.

Cytokine

CIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie - International Center for Infectiology Research, Lyon, France; Inserm, U1111 Lyon, France; Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France; CNRS, UMR5308, Lyon, France; Service d'Immunologie biologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Centre de référence des rhumatismes inflammatoires et maladies auto-immunes systémiques rares de l'enfant RAISE, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.

Published: January 2019

Type I interferonopathies are characterized by an increase of circulating type I interferon (IFN) concentration. Type I interferonopathies refer to rare Mendelian genetic disorders such as Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome (AGS) as well as more frequent and polygenic auto-immune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Yet, detection of type I IFN in these patients remains challenging as its amount is usually very low in patients' sera. Thus, the detection of interferon-stimulating genes has been proposed as an alternative for the detection of this cytokine but sensitivy, specificity and predictive values of the assay have not been reported so far. In this study, we propose two different methods based on Nanostring or RT-qPCR to measure in the clinical routine the IFN response, defined as a set of transcripts that are systemically induced by IFNs. The IFN signature is composed of 6 IFN stimulated genes (ISGs) and has a strong predictive value for the diagnosis of type I interferonopathies. The use of this simple test might represent a gold standard for the evaluation of various autoimmune diseases. Moreover, this test could also be used to monitor patients treated with drugs targeting type I IFN pathway. When comparing both methods - Nanostring and qPCR - in terms of analytical performance, they provided similar results but Nanostring was quicker, easier to multiplex, and almost fully-automated, which represent a more reliable assay for the daily clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2018.10.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type interferonopathies
16
diagnosis type
8
type ifn
8
type
7
ifn
6
comparison rt-qpcr
4
nanostring
4
rt-qpcr nanostring
4
nanostring measurement
4
measurement blood
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!