AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated how a nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) affects membrane permeability in HEK293 cells, focusing on those with and without CaV1.3 L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) using different voltage levels (0, 1.4, 1.8, and 2.3 kV/cm).
  • - Results showed that at 1.8 kV/cm, around 50% of cells experienced a lasting increase in membrane conductance, while at 2.3 kV/cm, all cells were affected, indicating that higher voltages enhance membrane permeabilization.
  • - Cells expressing VGCC displayed about twice the increase in conductance compared to

Article Abstract

We compared membrane permeabilization by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) in HEK293 cells with and without assembled CaV1.3 L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC). Individual cells were subjected to one 300-ns pulse at 0 (sham exposure); 1.4; 1.8; or 2.3 kV/cm, and membrane permeabilization was evaluated by measuring whole-cell currents and by optical monitoring of cytosolic Ca. nsPEF had either no effect (0 and 1.4 kV/cm), or caused a lasting (>80 s) increase in the membrane conductance in about 50% of cells (1.8 kV/cm), or in all cells (2.3 kV/cm). The conductance pathway opened by nsPEF showed strong inward rectification, with maximum conductance increase for the inward current at the most negative membrane potentials. Although these potentials were below the depolarization threshold for VGCC activation, the increase in conductance in cells which expressed VGCC (VGCC+ cells) was about twofold greater than in cells which did not (VGCC- cells). Among VGCC+ cells, the nsPEF-induced increase in membrane conductance showed a positive correlation with the amplitude of VGCC current measured in the same cells prior to nsPEF exposure. These findings demonstrate that the expression of VGCC makes cells more susceptible to membrane permeabilization by nsPEF. Time-lapse imaging of nsPEF-induced Ca transients confirmed permeabilization by a single 300-ns pulse at 1.8 or 2.3 kV/cm, but not at 1.4 kV/cm, and the transients were expectedly larger in VGCC+ cells. However, it remains to be established whether larger transients reflected additional Ca entry through VGCC, or were a result of more severe electropermeabilization of VGCC+ cells.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.08.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vgcc+ cells
16
cells
13
membrane permeabilization
12
voltage-gated calcium
8
nanosecond pulsed
8
pulsed electric
8
electric field
8
300-ns pulse
8
increase membrane
8
membrane conductance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!