Purpose: To estimate implant survival and peri-implant bone resorption around long vs normal-length implants in full-arch immediate loading rehabilitation of maxillary arches of low bone quality (D4).

Materials And Methods: A total of 45 patients received two mesial normal-length (10 to 15 mm) or longer (18 to 20 mm) implants and two long (18 to 20 mm) distally tilted implants. Differences in bone resorption at 24 months were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U Test.

Results: At the 24-month follow-up, no significant differences were found in survival (global cumulative survival rate: 98.9%) or bone resorption (mean: 1.1 mm) between long and normal implants (P = .053).

Conclusion: At 24 months, the use of long implants provides favorable survival and bone maintenance results in the immediate loading rehabilitation of low-quality maxillary arches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5756DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone resorption
16
maxillary arches
12
survival rate
8
long implants
8
resorption long
8
loading rehabilitation
8
bone
6
implants
6
survival
5
long
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!