AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored how adding Mn(IV)-oxide phases like pyrolusite or birnessite could help remediate mercury-contaminated sediments by affecting redox potential and reducing mercury methylation.
  • In tank experiments, changes in the mineral forms and oxidation states of manganese were tracked over 4 to 15 months, revealing differing rates of reduction between the two compounds, with birnessite showing quicker conversion to Mn(II) carbonate.
  • The findings indicated that the effectiveness and longevity of manganese amendments in controlling sediment redox conditions depend on the type of manganese oxide used, along with its physical properties, suggesting different strategies may be needed for optimal treatment depending on the conditions at specific sites.

Article Abstract

Addition of Mn(iv)-oxide phases pyrolusite or birnessite was investigated as a remedial amendment for Hg-contaminated sediments. Because inorganic Hg methylation is a byproduct of bacterial sulfate reduction, reaction of Mn(iv) oxide with pore water should poise sediment oxidation potential at a level higher than favorable for Hg methylation. Changes in Mn(iv)-oxide mineralogy and oxidation state over time were investigated in sediment tank mesocosm experiments in which Mn(iv)-oxide amendment was either mixed into Hg-contaminated sediment or applied as a thin-layer sand cap on top of sediment. Mesocosms were sampled between 4 and 15 months of operation and solid phases were characterized by X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). For pyrolusite-amended sediments, Mn(iv) oxide was altered to a mixture of Mn(iii)-oxyhydroxide and Mn, Fe(iii, ii)-oxide phases, with a progressive increase in the Mn(ii)-carbonate fraction over time as mesocosm sediments became more reduced. For birnessite-amended sediments, both Mn(iii) oxyhydroxide and Mn(ii) carbonate were identified at 4 months, indicating a faster rate of Mn reduction compared to pyrolusite. After 15 months of reaction, birnessite was converted completely to Mn(ii) carbonate, whereas residual Mn, Fe(iii, ii)-oxide phases were still present in addition to Mn(ii) carbonate in the pyrolusite mesocosm. In the thin-layer sand cap mesocosms, no changes in either pyrolusite or birnessite XAS spectra were observed after 10 months of reaction. Equilibrium phase relationships support the interpretation of mineral redox buffering by mixed-valent (Mn, Fe)(iii, ii)-oxide phases. Results suggest that amendment longevity for redox buffering can be controlled by adjusting the mass and type of Mn(iv) oxide applied, mineral crystallinity, surface area, and particle size. For a given site, amendment capping versus mixing with sediment should be evaluated to determine the optimum treatment approach, which may vary depending on application constraints, rate of Mn(iv) oxide transformation, and frequency of reapplication to maintain desired oxidation state and pH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7em00576hDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mniv oxide
16
feiii ii-oxide
12
ii-oxide phases
12
mnii carbonate
12
pyrolusite birnessite
8
oxidation state
8
thin-layer sand
8
sand cap
8
months reaction
8
redox buffering
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!