Transvenous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion offer numerous advantages over epicardial techniques. Although the cephalic, axillary, and subclavian veins are most commonly used in clinical practice, they each offer their own set of advantages and disadvantages that leave their usage dependent on patient anatomy and physician preference. Alternative methods using the upper and lower venous circulation have been described when these veins are not available or practical for lead insertion. Until current technology is superseded by leadless pacing systems, the search for the optimal lead insertion technique continues.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccep.2018.05.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!