Objectives: The main objective is to compare the accuracy of EUS and CEH EUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC). The secondary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of EUS FNA and to determine to what extent EUS and CEH EUS findings are affected by endosonographer subjectivity.
Methods: A prospective single-centre study was conducted in patients with pancreatic lesions detected on CT. The patients were examined by EUS, CEH EUS and EUS FNA. The obtained results were compared with the final diagnosis that was based on cytology and further clinical findings and on histopathological findings from subjects who underwent surgery. A second reading of the EUS and CEH EUS images was performed by the endosonographer, who was blinded to clinical data of patients.
Results: We examined 116 patients, 73 had a final diagnosis of PC, 14 had NETs and 20 had other tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy of EUS for diagnosis of PC were 83.1, 62.5, 83.1, 70.7 and 78.6%, for CEH EUS 94.5, 61.7, 84.1, 84 and 84.1% and for EUS FNA 87.6, 91.2, 95.5, 77.5 and 88.8, respectively. The inter-observer agreement for EUS marker of PC was good (κ = 0.75), and that for CEH EUS was average (κ = 0.59 for arterial phase and κ = 0.68 for washout in venous phase).
Conclusion: CEH EUS is a non-invasive method that allows more accurate identification of PC than EUS. The subjectivity of CEH EUS evaluation is worse than that of EUS but acceptable.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1524023 | DOI Listing |
Neoplasia
January 2025
Department of Cancer Prevention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China; Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018, China. Electronic address:
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape in pancreatic cancer (PC) screening, diagnosis, and early detection. This emphasizes the need for targeted screening in high-risk groups, particularly those with familial predispositions and genetic mutations, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2. This review highlights the sporadic nature of most PC cases and significant risk factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, and diabetes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicina (Kaunas)
October 2024
Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milano, Italy.
: Subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract present a diagnostic challenge due to their heterogeneous nature and varied clinical manifestations. Usually, SELs are small and asymptomatic; generally discovered during routine endoscopy or radiological examinations. Currently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the best tool to characterize gastric SELs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntern Med
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Daido Hospital, Japan.
Pancreatology
June 2024
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address:
Background And Aims: Solid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and carrying risks to the patients.
Aim: assess the diagnostic adequacy of tissue acquisition using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) compared to conventional EUS.
Scand J Gastroenterol
May 2023
Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Objectives: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) has been used in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors by visualization of tumor microcirculation and perfusion. However, its diagnostic role in submucosal tumors (SMTs), especially leiomyomas and gastric submucosal tumors (GISTs) was rarely studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic role of CEH-EUS for SMTs (<50 mm) and the value of assessing the malignant potential of GISTs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!