Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation (GHK equation), one of the most successful achievements of membrane theory in electrophysiology, can precisely predict the membrane potential. Its conceptual foundation lies in the idea that the transmembrane ion transport across the plasma membrane is responsible for the membrane potential generation. However, the potential virtually equivalent to the membrane potential is generated even across the impermeable membrane. In this work, I discus the membrane potential generation mechanism and find that the potential formula based on the long-dismissed Ling's adsorption theory, which attributes the membrane potential generation to the mobile ion adsorption rather than the transmembrane ion transport, is the same as the GHK equation. Based on this finding, I derive a conclusion that the membrane potential is generated by the ion adsorption against the existing electrophysiological concept.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6408562 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10867-018-9512-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!