A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Combined Fluorescence Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Fluorescein Sodium at Glioblastoma Border: Intraoperative Findings and Histopathologic Data About 3 Newly Diagnosed Consecutive Cases. | LitMetric

Objective: Fluorescence-guided glioblastoma surgery is an intraoperative technique developed in recent years. Two main compounds have been used so far: 5-amilovelulinic acid (5-ALA) and fluorescein sodium (Fl-Na). Despite a large amount of literature on both techniques, few data are available on the use of both compounds in the same patient.

Methods: Three consecutive patients affected by a newly diagnosed glioblastoma underwent surgical resection using both 5-ALA and Fl-Na. 5-ALA was orally administered 3 hours before induction of anesthesia at a dosage of 20 mg/kg, whereas fluorescein was intravenously administered at induction of anesthesia at a dosage of 4 mg/kg. Tumor resection was carried out combining these fluorophores. At tumor borders, multiple samples were collected, and fluorescent pattern of each sample was registered. Samples were then analyzed by a neuropathologist blinded for intraoperative fluorescence findings.

Results: Eighteen samples were analyzed. At tumor margin, bright pink fluorescence was highly indicative of residual tumor (positive predictive value [PPV], 94%), and it was superior to faint pink and fluorescein (PPVs, 89% and 87%, respectively). The gradual reduction of pink fluorescence warned of the risk of gradually entering healthy tissue (specificity of 67% compared with 33% with fluorescein). Using 5-ALA, detecting no fluorescence was highly suggestive of healthy tissue (negative predictive value of 100% compared with 50% with fluorescence).

Conclusions: In our experience with 3 patients, the 2 techniques presented different advantages and limitations in specific steps of tumor resection, showing complementary properties. Larger studies are mandatory to investigate the synergistic use of both techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.163DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluorescein sodium
8
newly diagnosed
8
induction anesthesia
8
anesthesia dosage
8
dosage mg/kg
8
tumor resection
8
samples analyzed
8
pink fluorescence
8
fluorescence highly
8
healthy tissue
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!