AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the relationship between manual dexterity recovery and corticospinal tract (CST) injury in six stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation, focusing on finger movement control.
  • Key methods included assessing manual dexterity components, conducting structural MRI scans to evaluate CST lesion load, and using transcranial magnetic stimulation to measure CST excitability at various intervals post-stroke.
  • Results showed that while some gross motor skills improved, all patients still experienced difficulties in fine motor tasks, indicating that other brain areas may also contribute to manual dexterity beyond the CST.

Article Abstract

Objectives: In this longitudinal pilot study, we investigated how manual dexterity recovery was related to corticospinal tract (CST) injury and excitability, in six patients undergoing conventional rehabilitation.

Methods: Key components of manual dexterity, namely finger force control, finger tapping rate and independence of finger movements, were quantified. Structural MRI was obtained to calculate CST lesion load. CST excitability was assessed by measuring rest motor threshold (RMT) and the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Measurements were obtained at two weeks, three and six months post-stroke.

Results: At six months post-stroke, complete recovery of hand gross motor impairment (i.e., maximal Fugl-Meyer score for hand) had occurred in three patients and four patients had recovered ability to accurately control finger force. However, tapping rate and independence of finger movements remained impaired in all six patients at six months. Recovery in hand gross motor impairment and finger force control occurred in patients with smaller CST lesion load and almost complete recovery of CST excitability, although RMT or MEP size remained slightly altered in the stroke-affected hemisphere compared to the unaffected hemisphere. The two patients with poorest recovery showed persistent absence of MEPs and greatest structural injury to CST.

Discussion: The findings support good motor recovery being overall correlated with smaller CST lesion, and with almost complete recovery of CST excitability. However, impairment of manual dexterity persisted despite recovery in gross hand movements and grasping abilities, suggesting involvement of additional brain structures for fine manual tasks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2018.10.065DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

manual dexterity
16
lesion load
12
finger force
12
cst lesion
12
cst excitability
12
complete recovery
12
longitudinal pilot
8
pilot study
8
recovery
8
force control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!