A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnosing malignant pleural effusion using clinical and analytical parameters. | LitMetric

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common and diagnosis is often problematic. A cancer ratio (serum lactate dehydrogenases: pleural adenosine deaminase ratio) has been proposed for diagnosing MPE. However, the usefulness of this "cancer ratio" and the clinical-radiological criteria for diagnosing MPE has not been clearly determined to date. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of those parameters in the diagnosis of MPE.

Methods: We analyzed 240 patients including 120 with MPE and 120 with non-MPE (93 tuberculous and 27 parapneumonic). Patients were divided into two groups: MPE and non-MPE (eg, tuberculous and parapneumonic). We constructed two predictive models to assess the probability of MPE: (a) clinical-radiological data only and (b) a combination of clinical-radiological data, the cancer ratio, and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The performances of the predictive models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and by examining the calibration.

Results: The area under the ROC curves for model 1 and model 2 were excellent, 0.936 and 0.998, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracies for model 1 and model 2 were 87.5% and 98.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: The results confirm that both models achieved a high diagnostic accuracy for MPE; however, model 2 was superior with the addition of its simplicity of use in daily practice. This model should be applied to determine which patients with a pleural effusion of unknown origin would not benefit from further invasive procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6818593PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22689DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pleural effusion
12
malignant pleural
8
cancer ratio
8
diagnosing mpe
8
non-mpe tuberculous
8
tuberculous parapneumonic
8
predictive models
8
clinical-radiological data
8
roc curves
8
model model
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!