Indirect immunofluorescence and microneutralization methods for the detection of antibodies to poliovirus serotypes 1, 2, and 3 were compared. Of the 41 sera tested for poliovirus type 1 antibody, 40% were in complete agreement, 55% differed by one dilution, and 5% differed by two dilutions. For poliovirus type 2, 37 sera were tested; 56% completely agreed, and 44% differed by only one dilution. For poliovirus type 3, complete agreement occurred in 59% of 33 sera, while 41% differed by one dilution. No false-negative results were obtained. These findings suggest that indirect immunofluorescence for poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3 is as sensitive as the microneutralization method and could represent a less cumbersome alternative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC269207PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.7.1325-1326.1987DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

indirect immunofluorescence
12
poliovirus type
12
differed dilution
12
immunofluorescence microneutralization
8
detection antibodies
8
sera tested
8
complete agreement
8
poliovirus
5
comparison indirect
4
microneutralization detection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!