AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of functional MRI for diagnosing locally recurrent prostate cancer through a meta-analysis of existing research from 1995 to 2016.
  • - Results from 13 studies showed high sensitivity (91%) and specificity (91%) for patients post-surgery, while 7 studies showed lower sensitivity (80%) and specificity (81%) for those who had radiotherapy.
  • - The findings indicate that while functional MRI may not significantly enhance T2-weighted imaging, combining diffusion-weighted MRI and H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy with T2-weighted imaging can improve diagnostic sensitivity in patients post-radiotherapy.

Article Abstract

Objective: To perform a meta-analysis to quantitatively assess functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of locally recurrent prostate cancer.

Materials And Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2016. Diagnostic accuracy was quantitatively pooled for all studies by using hierarchical logistic regression modeling, including bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves (AUCs). The Z test was used to determine whether adding functional MRI to T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) results in significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Meta-analysis of 13 studies involving 826 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91%, and the AUC was 0.96. Meta-analysis of 7 studies involving 329 patients who underwent radiotherapy showed a pooled sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81%, and the AUC was 0.88. Meta-analysis of 11 studies reporting 1669 sextant biopsies from patients who underwent radiotherapy showed a pooled sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 91%, and the AUC was 0.85. Sensitivity after radiotherapy was significantly higher when diffusion-weighted MRI data were combined with T2WI than when only T2WI results were used. This was true when meta-analysis was performed on a per-patient basis ( = 0.027) or per sextant biopsy ( = 0.046). A similar result was found when H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-MRS) data were combined with T2WI and sextant biopsy was the unit of analysis ( = 0.036).

Conclusion: Functional MRI data may not strengthen the ability of T2WI to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. By contrast, diffusion-weight MRI and H-MRS data may improve the sensitivity of T2WI for patients who have undergone radiotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201967PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

locally recurrent
12
recurrent prostate
12
meta-analysis studies
12
patients underwent
12
pooled sensitivity
12
functional magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
diagnosis locally
8
prostate cancer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!