Assessing the Professional Identity of Dental School Faculty: An Exploratory Study.

J Dent Educ

Gary Pape, MA, DDS, EdM, is Assistant Professor, College of Dental Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences; Fanglong Dong, PhD, is Associate Professor, Graduate College of Biomedical Sciences, Western University of Health Sciences; and Zsuzsa Horvath, PhD, is Assistant Professor and Director of Faculty Development, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.

Published: November 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Dental education is shifting from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered approach, highlighting the need for faculty to identify as educators.
  • In a survey of 536 dental faculty, 53.5% identified as educators, with those self-identifying as educators showing higher engagement in professional development related to teaching.
  • The significant differences in professional identity and training highlight potential areas for administrators to enhance faculty development programs and support educator identity.

Article Abstract

Experts have argued that dental education needs to shift from a teacher-centered paradigm to a learner-centered paradigm. Assisting faculty members to self-identify as educators may be a key to reaching that goal. The aim of this exploratory study was to assess how dental faculty members described their professional identity (educator or clinician) and the effect of their self-defined identity on their motivation to pursue professional development as educators. A 14-question anonymous survey was distributed electronically to all 536 part-time and full-time dental faculty members at two U.S. dental schools; 114 responses were recorded for a 21.5% response rate. Just over half of the survey respondents (53.5%, n=61) self-identified as educators, and the other 46.5% (n=53) self-identified as clinicians. A lower percentage of the self-identified clinicians were full-time employees (37.3%, n=25) than the self-identified educators (60.7%, n=42); the difference was statistically significant (p=0.0143). Among respondents who self-identified as educators, 53.2% (n=25) had taken four or more courses on teaching vs. 24.2% (n=8) of those who self-identified as clinicians (p=0.0321). Also, 50% (n=30) of the self-identified educators prioritized future teaching courses as their continuing education plan vs. 20.8% (n=11) of the self-identified clinicians (p=0.0013), and 49.2% (n=30) of the self-identified educators had attended at least one ADEA Annual Session vs. 15.4% (n=8) of the self-identified clinicians (p=0.0011); both of those differences were statistically significant. This study found that only about half of the respondents from two dental schools self-identified as educators, but nearly all viewed learning about teaching concepts and techniques as very or somewhat important. Administrators can use these findings to promote their faculty training initiatives and find ways to encourage and support educator identification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21815/JDE.018.117DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

self-identified educators
24
self-identified clinicians
20
faculty members
12
self-identified
11
professional identity
8
exploratory study
8
educators
8
dental faculty
8
dental schools
8
n=8 self-identified
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!