Background: This randomized phase 2 trial compared the efficacy and safety of second-line nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with or without the addition of CC-486 (an oral formulation of 5-azacytidine) in patients with advanced-stage, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m on days 8 and 15 plus CC-486 200 mg daily on days 1 to 14 or single-agent nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m on days 1 and 8, with both regimens administered every 21 days until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included the overall response rate, the disease control rate, and overall survival.
Results: Between January 2015 and August 2016, 161 patients were randomized (81 to the combination arm and 80 to the single-agent nab-paclitaxel arm). There was no benefit from the addition of CC-486 to nab-paclitaxel. The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months for the combination and 4.2 months for single-agent nab-paclitaxel (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.9). The median overall survival was 8.1 months in the combination arm and 17 months in the single-agent nab-paclitaxel arms (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.57). Grade 3 or greater treatment-related, emergent adverse events were reported by 40.5% of patients in the combination arm and by 31.6% of those in the single-agent nab-paclitaxel arm.
Conclusions: Single-agent nab-paclitaxel was associated with promising outcomes and a tolerable safety profile as second-line treatment for patients with advanced-stage, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. There was no benefit from the addition of CC-486 to nab-paclitaxel.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31779 | DOI Listing |
Front Immunol
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer (PC), with no established consensus on the optimal treatment for postoperative liver metastasis recurrence. We report a case of a 48-year-old male patient who underwent radical surgery and was pathologically diagnosed with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) PASC. The patient experienced liver metastasis recurrence following single-agent gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnticancer Res
November 2024
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Background/aim: The efficacy of cytotoxic chemo-therapy has been reported to improve after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration. We previously conducted a multicenter prospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) after ICI treatment. In that study, some patients showed a long-term response to nab-PTX, which is not usually observed with single-agent chemotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiscov Oncol
October 2024
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Feng Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Cancer Manag Res
August 2024
Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal and rarely resectable malignancy. Here we explore the outcomes of surgery, as compared to definitive radiotherapy (dRT) or systemic therapy only in PDAC.
Methods: Pancreatic surgery and radiotherapy in Southwest Finland have been centralized to Turku University Hospital.
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol
June 2024
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Introduction and objective: The approach to patients with advanced or metastatic high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has evolved over time with the advent of new therapies and multimodal strategies. The objective of this consensus of experts is to generate national recommendations for the profiling and management of advanced or metastatic high-grade OEC, defined as stages III and IV of the “The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification at the time of diagnosis to base on the literature review that included international evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Material and methods: Eleven panelists (oncologists and gynecological oncologists) answered 8 questions about the profiling and management of advanced or metastatic ovarian epithelial carcinoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!