Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Immunofixation is currently very used in medical laboratories. The interpretation of the results is usually easy, but some cases raise interpretative problems. We here report two cases difficult to interpret. In the first case, we report a case of nonspecific precipitation of the protein on each track, in the second case we report a case of double monoclonal band on immunofixation electrophoresis. Reducing agent such as β2-mercaptoethanol used in these two cases allowed to solve the problem and to make a diagnosis. A comparison between clinical radiological and laboratory test data is necessary before making a diagnosis of monoclonal immunoglobulin.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6201619 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.130.13662 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!