Awake Multimodal Phenotyping for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Outcome.

J Clin Sleep Med

Centre for Sleep Health and Research, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.

Published: November 2018

Study Objectives: An oral appliance (OA) is a validated treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, therapeutic response is not certain in any individual and is a clinical barrier to implementing this form of therapy. Therefore, accurate and clinically applicable prediction methods are needed. The goal of this study was to derive prediction models based on multiple awake assessments capturing different aspects of the pharyngeal response to mandibular advancement. We hypothesized that a multimodal model would provide robust prediction.

Methods: Patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 10 events/h) were recruited for treatment with a customized OA (n = 142, 59% male). Participants underwent facial photography (craniofacial structure), spirometry (mid-inspiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [MIF] and mid-expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [MEF] and the ratio MEF/MIF) and nasopharyngoscopy (velopharyngeal collapse with Mueller maneuver and mandibular advancement). Treatment response was defined by 3 criteria: (1) AHI < 5 events/h plus ≥ 50% reduction, (2) AHI < 10 events/h plus ≥ 50% reduction, (3) ≥ 50% AHI reduction. Multivariable regression models were used to assess predictive utility of phenotypic assessments compared to clinical characteristics alone (age, sex, obesity, baseline AHI).

Results: Craniofacial structure and flow-volume loops predicted treatment response. Accuracy of the prediction models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for each criterion were 0.90 (criterion 1), 0.79 (criterion 2), and 0.78 (criterion 3). However, these prediction models including phenotypic assessments did not provide a statistically significant improvement over clinical predictors only.

Conclusions: Multimodal awake phenotyping does not enhance OA treatment outcome prediction. These office-based, awake assessments have limited utility for robust clinical prediction models. Future work should focus on sleep-related assessments.

Commentary: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1837.

Clinical Trial Registration: Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Title: Multimodal phenotyping for the prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea, Identifier: ACTRN12611000409976, URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=336663.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223562PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.7484DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prediction models
16
oral appliance
12
treatment outcome
12
≥ 50%
12
multimodal phenotyping
8
prediction
8
phenotyping prediction
8
prediction oral
8
appliance treatment
8
obstructive sleep
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!