Objective: To explore clinical effect of arthroscopic cyst removal and wire-guided suture for the treatment of lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint.

Methods: From July 2014 to December 2017, 33 patients with lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint were treated by arthroscopic cysts removal and wire-guided suture, including 13 males and 20 females, aged from 20 to 55 years old with an average age of(36.23 ±2.30) years old, the courses of disease ranged from 3 to 14 months with an average of(4.60±0.83) months; Preoperative MRI examination was clear diagnosed. There were 14 cysts on anterior horn, 18 cysts on meniscal body and 1 cyst on posterior horn;all cysts were solitary, and 3 of them were multilocular. Lysholm score and GLASOW score of knee joint function and clinical efficacy were observed before and after operation at 6 months.

Results: All patients were followed up form 6 to 24 months with an average of (7.5±1.2) months. Preoperative symptoms disappeared or significantly alleviated, and all incisions were healed by intention without complication and neurovascular injury. MRI showed meniscal tear areas and cystic defective areas healed, cyst was not recurrenced, healing time ranged form 8 to 12 weeks with an average of (9.6±1.6) weeks, and patients recovered their daily life and exercise. There was significant difference in Lysholm score before operation (61.12±4.35) and after operation at 6 momths(91.32±3.36)(=46.11, <0.01);according to GLASOW assessment, 31 patients with excellent recovery, and 2 good.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic cyst removal and wire-guided suture for the treatment of lateral meniscal cyst of knee joint could reserve meniscus, repair injury of meniscus, recover knee joint function after operation, and is worth popularizing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.10.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

removal wire-guided
12
wire-guided suture
12
lateral meniscal
12
meniscal cyst
12
cyst knee
12
cyst removal
8
suture treatment
8
treatment lateral
8
knee joint
8
months average
8

Similar Publications

Background: The current standard for the preoperative marking of non-palpable breast lesions is wire guided localization (WGL) which is associated with logistical efforts and patient discomfort. Non-radioactive seeds (NRS) recently challenged the use of WGL; but do they provide a better alternative from a logistical and environmental perspective?

Methods: WGL standard was compared with NRS available in Germany: Magseed®, Pintuition®, SAVI SCOUT ® and LOCalizer™ on a logistical and carbon-footprinting basis. In the logistical analysis the number of patient contacts with the healthcare system for lesion localization/removal and the number of breast punctures were evaluated in two different clinical scenarios (primary surgery and secondary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study compared the effectiveness of two newer methods for locating non-palpable breast lesions—Magnetic Seed (Magseed) and Radiofrequency Identification (RFID)—against traditional wire-guided techniques.
  • - Using turkey breasts and raisins as simulation models, both techniques achieved a 100% success rate in lesion localization, but Magseed had shorter operation times while RFID had shorter incisions.
  • - Overall, neither method showed a significant advantage over the other in terms of effectiveness or surgical outcomes, suggesting both can be used safely for lesion localization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: For many years, the gold standard in the localization of non-palpable malignant breast tumors has been the use of wire-guided method. However, this has recently been replaced by more modern localization techniques in many institutions.

Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study comparing two localization techniques (iodine seed 125I and wire-guided localization) for localizing non-palpable tumors in patients with histologically verified breast carcinoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Surgical treatment of forefoot and midfoot fractures : Minimally invasive fixation of metatarsal fractures].

Oper Orthop Traumatol

August 2024

Klinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.

Objective: Minimally invasive stabilization of metatarsal fractures to enable adequate fracture healing in a correct position to restore anatomy and biomechanics of the foot.

Indications: A. Dislocated diaphyseal and subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metatarsal (> 3 mm, > 10° dislocation).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!