AI Article Synopsis

  • Recovery from anesthesia may not just be a simple reversal of the induction process, as recent discussions highlight the concept of "neural inertia," where changes in consciousness could show hysteresis.
  • The study investigated this phenomenon by analyzing propofol concentrations during 46 surgeries, looking specifically at the moments of loss and recovery of responsiveness.
  • Results indicated that there was a significant difference in propofol concentrations between the moments of loss of responsiveness (LOR) and recovery of responsiveness (ROR), supporting the idea of hysteresis in human consciousness recovery during anesthesia.

Article Abstract

Background: Recovery of consciousness is usually seen as a passive process, with emergence from anesthesia depicted as the inverse process of induction resulting from the elimination of anesthetic drugs from their central nervous system sites of action. However, that need not be the case. Recently it has been argued that we might encounter hysteresis to changes in the state of consciousness, known as neural inertia. This phenomenon has been debated in neuroanesthesia, as manipulation of the brain might further influence recovery of consciousness. The present study is aimed at assessing hysteresis between induction and emergence under propofol-opioid neuroanesthesia in humans using estimated propofol concentrations in both spinal and intracranial surgeries.

Methods: We identified the moments of loss (LOR) and recovery of responsiveness (ROR) in 21 craniotomies and 25 spinal surgeries. Propofol was given slowly until loss of responsiveness and stopped at the end of surgery. An opioid was present at induction and recovery. Propofol infused was recorded and plasma and effect-site concentrations were estimated using 2 pharmacokinetic models. Dose-response curves were generated. Estimated propofol plasma and effect-site concentrations were compared to assess hysteresis.

Results: Estimated propofol concentrations at LOR and ROR showed hysteresis. Whether for spinal or intracranial surgeries, the EC50 of propofol at which half of the patients entered and exited the state of responsiveness was significantly different.

Conclusions: Hysteresis was observed between propofol concentrations at LOR and ROR, in both patients presenting for spinal and intracranial surgeries. Manipulation of the brain does not appear to change patterns of hysteresis, suggesting that neural inertia may occur in humans, in a way similar to that found in animal species. These findings justify performing a clinical study in patients using measured propofol concentrations to assess neural inertia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000559DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal intracranial
16
propofol concentrations
16
intracranial surgeries
12
neural inertia
12
estimated propofol
12
patterns hysteresis
8
hysteresis induction
8
induction emergence
8
recovery consciousness
8
manipulation brain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!