A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus). | LitMetric

Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Behav Processes

Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Letters, University of Notre Dame, 390 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.

Published: December 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated how goldfish recognize 2D objects that are rotated in space, which is important for their navigation in a three-dimensional environment.
  • Goldfish were trained in a task to distinguish between two objects at a specific angle, then tested on their ability to recognize these objects at various rotated angles, with varying degrees of success.
  • Results showed that while goldfish had some ability to identify objects from different angles, they did not consistently perform well across all angles, indicating they do not inherently process these rotated images from a stable viewpoint.

Article Abstract

This study examined the ability of goldfish to visually identify 2D objects rotated in the picture plane. This ability would be adaptive for fish since they move in three dimensions and frequently view objects from different orientations. Goldfish performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they were trained to discriminate between two objects at 0°, then tested with novel aspect angles (+/- 45°, +/- 90°, +/- 135°, 180°). Stimuli consisted of an arrow and half circle (Experiment 1) and line drawings of a turtle and frog (Experiments 2 and 3). In the first two experiments, the S+ and S- were presented at the same aspect angle. Performance in these experiments exceeded chance on four of seven novel aspect angles. Overall accuracy was not significantly different with complex stimuli (animal drawings) vs. simple stimuli (geometric shapes). In Experiment 3, when fish were tested with the S+ at varying aspect angles and the S- always presented at 0°, the fish failed to discriminate among the stimuli at all but one aspect angle. These goldfish viewing planar-rotated 2D objects did not display viewpoint-invariant performance, nor did they show a systematic decrement in performance as a function of aspect angle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aspect angles
12
aspect angle
12
planar-rotated objects
8
novel aspect
8
aspect
6
objects
5
visual perception
4
perception planar-rotated
4
goldfish
4
objects goldfish
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!