AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of different phone reminder approaches for annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in promoting colorectal cancer screening among patients aged 50-75.
  • Patients who failed to return the FIT were randomized to receive either automated reminders or a mix of automated and live reminders, with return rates measured over six months.
  • Results showed no significant difference in return rates between the two reminder methods overall, but Spanish-speaking patients had higher completion rates with automated reminders compared to the mixed approach, highlighting the importance of tailoring outreach efforts.

Article Abstract

The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the effectiveness of two phone-based approaches to mailed FIT outreach reminders. In fall 2016, patients ages 50-75, due for colorectal cancer screening, and with a visit in the previous year at either of two clinics, were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not return the FIT within 3 weeks (N = 427) were randomized to receive either: a) a series of up to 6 automated phone reminders; or b) the combination of automated and live phone reminders (up to 6 in total). The sole outcome was FIT return within 6 months after the FIT mailing. FIT completion rates were similar in the groups assigned to receive automated calls vs automated plus live calls (40% vs 39%; p = 0.89). The effectiveness of FIT reminder mode differed by language preference (p for interaction = 0.03): among Spanish-preferring patients (n = 106), FIT return rates were higher in the automated-only group than to the auto- plus live-call group (62% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Among English-preferring patients, no difference in modes was observed (n = 279, 32% vs 34%, p = 0.74). We observed no added benefit of live reminder calls in a mailed FIT plus automated call reminder program; our findings may inform efforts to efficiently optimize mailed-FIT outreach programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01742065.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6199768PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

automated live
12
phone reminders
12
fit return
12
fit
10
live phone
8
mailed-fit outreach
8
fit outreach
8
return rates
8
mailed fit
8
reminders
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!