Whilst the global prevalence of haemophilia B is less than that of haemophilia A, rapid and remarkable innovations have been made in the development of haemophilia B therapies in the last decade. The most recent developments are the evolution of extended half-life haemophilia B replacement therapies which are designed to reduce the treatment burden associated with prophylactic infusion of factor IX (FIX) to prevent bleeding in haemophilia B participants. Clinical development programmes have culminated in the completion of three phase III studies on extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FIX (rFIX) products and subsequent approval and registration of these in many countries around the world. Current data from the three EHL rFIX clinical studies indicate that these products have acceptable safety profiles with no allergic reactions, thromboembolic phenomena or neutralizing antibodies when given to previously treated adolescent and adults for the prevention of bleeds, for the treatment of bleeds and in the perisurgical haemostasis use. Studies in previously untreated paediatric participants are currently ongoing. The EHL rFIX products have the potential impact to reduce the treatment burden associated with prophylactic infusion of replacement FIX, to treat and prevent bleeds in participants with haemophilia B and to improve the participant's health-related quality of life. The impact of EHL rFIX is likely to be modified by current development of other haemophilia B therapy such as antitissue factor pathway inhibitors and haemophilia B gene therapy. In this review, we aim to provide an update on the safety and efficacy data from the three EHL rFIX clinical studies and to consider their roles in the face of novel haemophilia B therapy currently evolving.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196631 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620718802606 | DOI Listing |
Haemophilia
November 2024
Àrea del medicament, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.
Introduction: The value of gene therapies for haemophilia needs to be assessed holistically.
Aim: To determine the value of etranacogene dezaparvovec (ED) compared to current extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factors (rFIX), using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).
Method: MCDA EVIDEM methodology adapted to orphan drugs was used, with nine quantitative criteria and four contextual criteria.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
October 2024
Department of Hospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost
November 2023
Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Background: Clotting factor concentrates have been the mainstay of severe hemophilia treatment over the last 50 years. Differences in risk of neutralizing antibody (inhibitor) formation according to concentrate used remain clinically relevant.
Objectives: To assess inhibitor development according to type of clotting factor concentrate in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A and B.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
January 2024
Hospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aims: Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIX-Fc) is an extended half-life factor concentrate administered to haemophilia B patients. So far, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model has only been published for patients aged ≥12 years. The aim was to externally evaluate the predictive performance of the published rFIX-Fc population PK model for patients of all ages and develop a model that describes rFIX-Fc PK using real-world data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHematol Rep
June 2023
Haemophilia Centre, General Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35121 Padua, Italy.
The Medical Directors of nine Italian Hemophilia Centers reviewed and discussed the key issues concerning the replacement therapy of hemophilia patients during a one-day consensus conference held in Rome one year ago. Particular attention was paid to the replacement therapy needed for surgery using continuous infusion (CI) versus bolus injection (BI) of standard and extended half-life Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in severe hemophilia A patients. Among the side effects, the risk of development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and thromboembolic complications was addressed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!