The Health of the Small-Group Insurance Market.

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)

School of Allied Health Professions, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Published: October 2018

Issue: There has been relatively little discussion about the small-group employer insurance market since the implementation of reforms under the Affordable Care Act. It is important to understand the condition of this market before the impact of recent regulatory changes from the Trump administration.

Goal: To understand how the ACA’s market reforms have affected prices, enrollment, and competition in the small-group market.

Methods: Analysis of financial data filed by small-group insurers with the federal government, along with relevant published literature.

Findings And Conclusions: Enrollment has declined in the small-group market, although this is largely a continuation of a trend in place prior to the ACA. Substantially more small-business owners and workers now have coverage than prior to the ACA because many have been able to take advantage of subsidized individual plans through the marketplaces. For those who remain in the small-group market, price increases have been similar to those in the large-group market. The ACA has not reduced the cost of small-group insurance, but has made it more accessible and comprehensive without harming the market. It will be important to continue monitoring the small-group market to ensure that recent regulatory changes do not worsen market conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small-group market
12
market
10
small-group insurance
8
insurance market
8
regulatory changes
8
prior aca
8
small-group
7
health small-group
4
market issue
4
issue discussion
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • There is an increasing interest in vasectomies following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision, highlighting their safety and cost-effectiveness compared to tubal sterilization.
  • Health care providers from Title X-funded clinics were interviewed to understand the cultural, gender, and political influences on men's decisions to seek vasectomies.
  • Key barriers identified included income challenges, language barriers, medical distrust, and traditional gender roles, but many men expressed a strong desire to take responsibility for contraception and contribute to reproductive health equity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Providers Paid Substantially Less By Marketplace Nongroup Insurers Than By Employer Small-Group Plans, 2021.

Health Aff (Millwood)

December 2024

Karen Stockley, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Washington, D.C.

Numerous studies show that employer plans pay providers significantly more than Medicare, but less is known about prices in nongroup plans sold both on and off the Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), where narrow networks and low-cost insurers are more prevalent. We estimated prices for three market segments (Marketplace nongroup, off-Marketplace nongroup, and employer small group) and three types of services (professional, outpatient hospital, and inpatient hospital) relative to a Medicare benchmark. We used 2021 claims data covering virtually all enrollment in ACA risk-adjusted plans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Statistical noise in PD-(L)1 inhibitor trials: unraveling the durable-responder effect.

J Clin Epidemiol

November 2024

School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Background And Objectives: Programmed-death-1/ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1/L1is) have emerged as pivotal treatments for many cancers. A notable feature of this class of medicines is the dichotomous response pattern: A small (but clinically relevant) percentage of patients (5%-20%) benefit from deep and durable responses resembling functional cures (durable responders), while most patients experience only a modest or negligible response. Accurately predicting durable responders remains elusive due to the lack of a reliable biomarker.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The No Surprises Act eliminates surprise billing and sets up an independent dispute resolution (IDR) process for conflicts between health plans and providers.
  • In a 2023 analysis of IDR data for emergency medicine visits, providers won 86% of disputes, with decisions averaging 2.7 times the qualifying payment amount (QPA).
  • The analysis revealed that disputes were largely influenced by a few dominant health plans and providers, leading to payments that may not accurately represent the emergency service market.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!