Quality and readability of online information about type 2 diabetes and nutrition.

JAAPA

Stephanie Bernard is an assistant professor in the PA program at Shenandoah University in Leesburg, Va. Tiffany Cooke practices at Valley GI Consultants in Glendale, Ariz. Tascha Cole is a data manager for the PA program at Shenandoah University. Laura Hachani practices in the cardiac unit at Good Samaritan Hospital in Baltimore, Md. Johnathan Bernard is an orthopedic surgeon at the National Sports Medicine Institute in Leesburg, Va. Dr. Bernard discloses research/grant support from the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Smith and Nephew, Inc., and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, and financial or material support from Supreme Orthopedic Systems, LLC, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Published: November 2018

Objective: The internet has become a vital resource through which patients learn about medical conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and readability of online information about nutrition and diabetes management.

Methods: An internet search was conducted using three search terms of varying sophistication (how to eat with diabetes, diabetes diet, and medical nutrition therapy for diabetes) and the three most popular search engines (Yahoo, Bing, and Google). Forty-two websites were prospectively analyzed for quality of information and assessed for readability using the Flesch-Kincaid score.

Results: The 42 websites reviewed demonstrated wide variability in quality, regardless of the search term entered. The reading level required to understand the materials varied based on sophistication of the search term and ranged from the 6th- to the 11th-grade level.

Conclusions: The quality of online information on nutrition education for patients with diabetes was extremely variable and readability often was higher than the average American reading level (8th grade). An awareness of quality and readability of the materials found on the internet can strengthen the patient-provider relationship.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000546481.02560.4eDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality readability
12
readability online
8
online nutrition
8
search term
8
reading level
8
quality
6
diabetes
6
search
5
online type
4
type diabetes
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease with a rising prevalence worldwide. Person-centered treatment factors, including comorbidities and treatment goals, should be considered in determining the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a large language model, holds the potential performance in various fields, including medicine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the capability of three AI chatbots-ChatGPT 4.0, Claude 3.0, and Gemini Pro, as well as Google-in responding to common postkidney transplantation inquiries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living (FARS-ADL) is a validated and highly utilized measure for evaluating patients with Friedreich Ataxia. While construct validity of FARS-ADL has been shown for spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), content validity has not been established.

Methods: Individuals with SCA1 or SCA3 (n = 7) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with SCA expertise (n = 8) participated in qualitative interviews evaluating the relevance, clarity, and clinical meaningfulness of FARS-ADL for assessment of individuals with SCA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Various large language models (LLMs) can provide human-level medical discussions, but they have not been compared regarding rhinoplasty knowledge. To compare the leading LLMs in answering complex rhinoplasty consultation questions as evaluated by plastic surgeons. Ten open-ended rhinoplasty consultation questions were presented to ChatGPT-4o, Google Gemini, Claude, and Meta-AI LLMs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) semen analysis (SA) products obviate barriers that deter men from clinic testing and have made strides in providing higher quality data. However, it is unclear how well these products adhere to the 2021 WHO guidelines on examination and processing of human spermatozoa as they pertain to the evaluation of male fertility.

Objective: We investigate the content and adherence to clinical guidelines associated with consumer-facing information on DTC analysis products.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!