Univariate meta-analysis concerns a single outcome of interest measured across a number of independent studies. However, many research studies will have also measured secondary outcomes. Multivariate meta-analysis allows us to take these secondary outcomes into account, and can also include studies where the primary outcome is missing. We define the efficiency (E) as the variance of the overall estimate from a multivariate meta-analysis relative to the variance of the overall estimate from a univariate meta-analysis. The extra information gained from a multivariate meta-analysis of n studies is then similar to the extra information gained if a univariate meta-analysis of the primary effect had a further n(1-E)/E studies. The variance contribution of a study's secondary outcomes (its borrowing of strength) can be thought of as a contrast between the variance matrix of the outcomes in that study and the set of variance matrices of all the studies in the meta-analysis. In the bivariate case this is given a simple graphical interpretation as the . We discuss how these findings can also be used in the context of random effects meta-analysis. Our discussion is motivated by a published meta-analysis of ten anti-hypertension clinical trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193545PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

secondary outcomes
16
multivariate meta-analysis
16
univariate meta-analysis
12
meta-analysis
10
outcomes multivariate
8
variance estimate
8
extra gained
8
studies
6
outcomes
5
variance
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!