A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quantitative Elastography of Rectal Lesions: The Value ofShear Wave Elastography in Identifying Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions. | LitMetric

Quantitative Elastography of Rectal Lesions: The Value ofShear Wave Elastography in Identifying Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions.

Ultrasound Med Biol

Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Cancer Hospital Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Published: January 2019

We evaluate the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in diagnosing benign and malignant rectal lesions. A total of 96 lesions were reviewed in this study; endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and SWE examinations were performed before surgery in all cases. Elasticity parameters including mean elastographic index (E), maximum elastographic index (E) and minimum elastographic index (E) were analyzed. Correlations between elastographic parameters and histopathological results were studied. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was analyzed. Of the 96 rectal lesions, 72 were malignant and 24 were benign. Compared with ERUS, ERUS + SWE had higher sensitivity (93.0% vs. 88.9%), specificity (83.3% vs. 79.2%), positive predictive value (94.4% vs. 92.7%), negative predictive value (80.0% vs. 70.4%) and overall accuracy (90.6% vs. 86.4%). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, E and E had larger areas under the curve: 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The optimal cutoff value was 61.3 kPa for E (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 87.5%) and 63.4 kPa for E (sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 83.3%). We obtained κ values of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.95) for ERUS and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99) for ERUS + SWE of differential diagnosis in two observers. The intra-class correlation coefficients for intra-observer variability of stiffness (E) in malignant lesions, benign lesions, surrounding normal rectal wall in malignant lesions and surrounding normal rectal wall in benign lesions were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95), respectively. SWE is a promising tool that yields valuable quantitative data additional to that provided by ERUS examination in rectal lesions. The cutoff value 61.3 kPa for E may serve as a complementary tool in diagnosis of rectal lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal lesions
24
lesions
11
rectal
8
wave elastography
8
benign malignant
8
malignant rectal
8
cutoff 613
8
613 kpa
8
malignant lesions
8
benign lesions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!