A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cesarean scar pregnancy; Diagnosis and management between 2003 and 2015 in a single center. | LitMetric

Cesarean scar pregnancy; Diagnosis and management between 2003 and 2015 in a single center.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA. Electronic address:

Published: October 2018

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate diagnosis and management of an ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous cesarean scar.

Materials And Methods: Between March 2003 and October 2015, total 64 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) were retrospectively reviewed. The cliniscal characteristics, diagnosis, various methods of treatment and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 6.5 ± 1.1 weeks and the number of previous cesarean section was 1.6 ± 0.6. The main ultrasonographic findings included anterior implantation of gestational sac within the previous CS scar and thinning of anterior myometrium (average: 3.0 ± 2.0 mm). Excluding 6 cases that were lost to follow up after diagnosis, 58 patients underwent first line treatment. The treatment was successful with first line therapy alone in 32 patients (55.2%). Emergency hysterectomy was necessary in 4 cases during following up of first line treatment. In 22 patients who underwent second line treatment, all of them were successfully treated with no additional treatment.

Conclusions: MTX treatment alone as first line treatment showed low success rate (41.3%). Wedge resection (100%) and hysteroscopy (66.7%) were relatively safe and they were the most successful treatment modalities in this study. Dilatation and curettage as first and second line treatment had about 20% and 16.7% risk of emergency hysterectomy due to severe hemorrhage respectively. Therefore, surgical modalities with direct visualization excluding dilatation and curettage seem to be more safe and successful than medical treatment using MTX alone. Early precise diagnosis and management of CSP will be very important to minimize the extent of treatment and thus improve clinical outcomes of the patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.08.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnosis management
12
treatment
11
cesarean scar
8
scar pregnancy
8
previous cesarean
8
clinical outcomes
8
patients underwent
8
treatment treatment
8
emergency hysterectomy
8
second treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!