Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon? Professional quality management could be very beneficial for academic research but needs to overcome specific caveats.

Ulrich Dirnagl Claudia Kurreck Esmeralda Castaños-Vélez René Bernard

EMBO Rep

Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Published: November 2018

Quality management systems have been effective in various industries, including clinical research.
These systems can enhance academic research by increasing rigor and reproducibility.
Adapting these systems to academic settings opens up significant improvement potential for research outcomes.

Quality management systems have a long and proven track record in many businesses and clinical research. Such systems, when adapting to academic research, have great potential to improve rigor and reproducibility. [Image: see text]

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216282	PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201847143	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality management

management academic

academic laboratories

laboratories burden

burden boon?

boon? professional

professional quality

management beneficial

beneficial academic

academic overcome

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!