Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac ion channelopathy that predisposes affected individuals to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Type 1 BrS is thought to take a more malignant clinical course than non-type 1 BrS. We hypothesized that the degrees of abnormal repolarization and conduction are greater in type 1 subjects and these differences can be detected by electrocardiography (ECG). Electrocardiographic data from spontaneous type 1 and non-type 1 BrS patients were analyzed. ECG parameters were measured from leads V1 to V3. Values were expressed as median [lower quartile-upper quartile] and compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Compared to non-type 1 BrS patients ( = 29), patients with spontaneous type 1 patterns ( = 22) showed similar ( > 0.05) heart rate (73 [64-77] vs. 68 [62-80] bpm), QRS duration (136 [124-161] vs. 127 [117-144] ms), uncorrected QT (418 [393-443] vs. 402 [386-424] ms) and corrected QT intervals (457 [414-474] vs. 430 [417-457] ms), JT intervals (174 [144-183] vs. 174 [150-188] ms), T T intervals (101 [93-120] vs. 99 [90-105] ms), T T/QT ratios (0.25 [0.23-0.27] vs. 0.24 [0.22-0.27]), T T/QRS (0.77 [0.62-0.87] vs. 0.77 [0.69-0.86]), T T/(QRS × QT) (0.00074 [0.00034-0.00096] vs. 0.00073 [0.00048-0.00012] ms), index of Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance (iCEB, QT/QRS, marker of wavelength: 3.14 [2.56-3.35] vs. 3.21 [2.85-3.46]) and corrected iCEB (QTc/QRS: 3.25 [2.91-3.73] vs. 3.49 [2.99-3.78]). Higher QRS dispersion was seen in type 1 subjects (QRSd: 34 [24-66] vs. 24 [12-34] ms) but QT dispersion (QTd: 48 [39-71] vs. 43 [22-94] ms), QTc dispersion (QTcd: 52 [41-79] vs. 46 [23-104] ms), JT dispersion (44 [23-62] vs. 45 [30-62] ms), T T dispersion (28 [15-34] vs. 29 [22-53] ms) or T T/QT dispersion (0.06 [0.03-0.08] vs. 0.08 [0.04-0.12]) did not differ between the two groups. Type 1 subjects showed higher (QRSd × T T)/QRS (25 [19-44] vs. 19 [9-30] ms) but similar iCEB dispersion (0.83 [0.49-1.14] vs. 0.61 [0.34-0.92]) and iCEBc dispersion (0.93 [0.51-1.15] vs. 0.65 [0.39-0.96]). Higher levels of dispersion in conduction and repolarization are found in type 1 than non-type 1 BrS patients, potentially explaining the higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in the former group.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180153 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00132 | DOI Listing |
Heart Rhythm O2
June 2022
Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Background: The type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern diagnostic of Brugada syndrome (BrS) can be dynamic. Limited studies have rigorously evaluated the temporal stability of the Brugada ECG pattern.
Objective: We sought to evaluate fluctuations of the Brugada pattern in serial resting ECGs from BrS patients managed within a large health care system.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol
July 2021
Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Background: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is diagnosed in patients with ST-segment elevation with spontaneous, drug-induced, or fever-induced type 1 morphology. Prognosis in type 2 or 3 Brugada electrocardiogram (Br-ECG) patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term prognosis in non-type 1 Br-ECG patients in a large Japanese cohort of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (The Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study [J-IVFS]).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Physiol
January 2019
Guang'anmen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med
October 2018
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a cardiac ion channelopathy that predisposes affected individuals to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Type 1 BrS is thought to take a more malignant clinical course than non-type 1 BrS. We hypothesized that the degrees of abnormal repolarization and conduction are greater in type 1 subjects and these differences can be detected by electrocardiography (ECG).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Cardiol
February 2019
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, United States of America; Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health System, Wynnewood, PA, United States of America; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Electronic address:
Background: A spontaneous coved-type ST segment elevation in the electrocardiogram (ECG) has long been recognized as a risk stratification tool in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). This Type-I ST segment elevation is known to exhibit high dynamicity, fluctuating between coved-type and non-coved ST segment elevation. Our objectives in this study were to: 1) Compare ECG parameters in patients with spontaneous coved-type (Type-I) vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!