Influenza Mandates and Religious Accommodation: Avoiding Legal Pitfalls.

J Law Med Ethics

Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, LL.B., Ph.D., is a Professor of Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law who specializes in law and policy related to vaccines. V.B. Dubal, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law who specializes in employment law and employment discrimination, and researches the intersection of work law and social change.

Published: September 2018

Influenza mandates in health care institutions are recommended by professional associations as an effective way to prevent the contraction of influenza by patients from health care workers. Health care institutions with such mandates must operate within civil rights frameworks. A recent set of cases against health care institutions with influenza mandates reveals the liabilities posed by federal law that protects employees from religious discrimination. This article examines this legal framework and draws important lessons from this litigation for health care institutions. We argue counterintuitively that providing religious exemptions from influenza mandates may expose health care institutions to more liability than not providing a formal exemption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073110518804237DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
24
care institutions
20
influenza mandates
16
health
6
care
6
influenza
5
institutions
5
mandates religious
4
religious accommodation
4
accommodation avoiding
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!