A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Versatile algorithmic midline approach to perineal urethrostomy for complex urethral strictures. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study presents an algorithmic approach to perineal urethrostomy (PU) for men with complex urethral strictures, using a midline perineal incision.
  • A retrospective review of 62 patients showed two techniques: a loop technique for those with distal strictures or lower BMI, and a 7-flap procedure for those with longer urethra-to-skin distances.
  • The success rates were high, with 92.9% for the 7-flap group and 100% for the loop group, highlighting the effectiveness of this standardized surgical method and resulting in high patient satisfaction.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To present results of an algorithmic approach to perineal urethrostomy (PU) based on a midline perineal incision among men with complex urethral strictures.

Methods: A single surgeon retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent PU between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Patient demographics and outcomes were collected via medical record review. After a midline perineal incision, the PU was matured either by (a) mobilization of the urethral plate (loop) alone in cases with distal strictures or low body mass index (BMI), or (b) with creation of a lateral perineal skin flap (7-flap) for those with longer urethra-to-skin distances. Success was defined as functional voiding without the need for further procedures. Patients were contacted by phone and administered validated questionnaires.

Results: Of 62 PU patients, 20 (32.3%) underwent the loop technique, and 42 (67.7%) had the 7-flap procedure, 7 of which were reoperative for prior failed PU. Median age was 61.9 years (range 23-85) and the median stricture length was 8.0 cm (range 2.5-18 cm). Mean BMI was greater among 7-flap compared to loop patients (34.9 vs. 30.0 kg/m, p = 0.01). Success rates were 92.9% (39/42) in the 7-flap group and 100% (20/20) in the loop PU cohort during a median follow-up of 30.7 months. Among 62 PU patients, 19 (30.6%) responded to the survey-median PGI-I score was 1.0 (range 1-2) indicating that symptoms were "very much improved".

Conclusions: The algorithmic midline approach to PU offers a standardized, versatile solution with excellent surgical outcomes and high patient satisfaction, even in obese or refractory stricture patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2522-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

algorithmic midline
8
midline approach
8
approach perineal
8
perineal urethrostomy
8
complex urethral
8
midline perineal
8
perineal incision
8
patients
6
perineal
5
versatile algorithmic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!