Courses in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) for doctors have consistently demonstrated short-term improvements in knowledge. However, there is no strong evidence linking EBM training to changes in clinical practice or patient outcomes. This systematic review investigates whether EBM training leads to sustained improvements in doctors' knowledge and practice behaviors that may also facilitate changes in patient outcomes and experiences. A literature search was undertaken in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, The Cochrane Library, ERIC and Scopus. Studies published from 1997 to 2016 that assessed outcomes of EBM educational interventions amongst doctors and used measures of knowledge, skills, attitudes, practice or patient outcomes were included. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis: four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three non-RCTs, and eight before-after (longitudinal cohort) studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meaningful comparisons. Varying degrees of bias due to the use of subjective measures were identified, limiting study validity. Results showed that EBM interventions can improve short-term knowledge and skills, but there is little reliable evidence of changes in long-term knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice. No study measured improvement in patient outcomes or experiences. EBM training for medical practitioners needs to incorporate measures of behavioral changes while incorporating patient outcomes and experience measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1503646DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient outcomes
20
practice patient
12
ebm training
12
evidence-based medicine
8
doctors' knowledge
8
knowledge practice
8
systematic review
8
clinical practice
8
outcomes experiences
8
knowledge skills
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Adherence to home rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to reach optimal functional outcomes, especially in fast-track procedures. The aim of this study is to identify which sociodemographic and health factors significantly affect adherence in this context.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial with 52 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In difficult colorectal cases, surgeons may opt for a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) colectomy or attempt a laparoscopic surgery that may require an unplanned conversion to open (LCOS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 types of surgeries.

Methods: Colectomies for acute diverticulitis with a HALS or LCOS surgery were selected from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2022 Targeted Colectomy Database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Wearable activity-measurement devices are increasingly popular among the public, but there is little information regarding their use among patients undergoing sports medicine procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare accelerometer-measured data with traditional patient-reported measures and to determine the trajectory of physical activity from before surgery to 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Materials And Methods: Adult patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were enrolled in this prospective cohort pilot study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Lumbar fusion and lumbar disk replacement (LDR) are common surgical options for chronic low back pain, but this study focused on comparing their postoperative management costs over two years.
  • A total of 1,660 patients were studied, revealing that the average cost for postoperative care was approximately $2,832 per patient, with similar costs for both procedures.
  • The main cost driver was physical therapy, highlighting that while LDR may have a shorter recovery, it does not significantly reduce long-term healthcare expenses compared to lumbar fusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.

Methods: We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!