AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if a machine learning algorithm utilizing echocardiographic data and clinical parameters could effectively categorize heart failure patients and identify those who would benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 1,106 heart failure patients and identified four distinct groups based on their characteristics and heart function, with two groups showing a significantly better response to the therapy compared to the others.
  • The findings suggest that combining clinical data with advanced imaging techniques through machine learning can lead to improved patient classification and potentially better treatment strategies for heart failure.

Article Abstract

Aims: We tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) algorithm utilizing both complex echocardiographic data and clinical parameters could be used to phenogroup a heart failure (HF) cohort and identify patients with beneficial response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods And Results: We studied 1106 HF patients from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%, QRS ≥ 130 ms, New York Heart Association class ≤ II) randomized to CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D, n = 677) or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD, n = 429). An unsupervised ML algorithm (Multiple Kernel Learning and K-means clustering) was used to categorize subjects by similarities in clinical parameters, and left ventricular volume and deformation traces at baseline into mutually exclusive groups. The treatment effect of CRT-D on the primary outcome (all-cause death or HF event) and on volume response was compared among these groups. Our analysis identified four phenogroups, significantly different in the majority of baseline clinical characteristics, biomarker values, measures of left and right ventricular structure and function and the primary outcome occurrence. Two phenogroups included a higher proportion of known clinical characteristics predictive of CRT response, and were associated with a substantially better treatment effect of CRT-D on the primary outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.64; P = 0.0005 and HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.68; P = 0.001] than observed in the other groups (interaction P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Our results serve as a proof-of-concept that, by integrating clinical parameters and full heart cycle imaging data, unsupervised ML can provide a clinically meaningful classification of a phenotypically heterogeneous HF cohort and might aid in optimizing the rate of responders to specific therapies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1333DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac resynchronization
12
resynchronization therapy
12
clinical parameters
12
left ventricular
12
primary outcome
12
heart failure
8
treatment crt-d
8
crt-d primary
8
clinical characteristics
8
clinical
5

Similar Publications

Background: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offers significant benefits in symptom alleviation, reduction of rehospitalization rates, and overall survival of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (rEF). However, despite its proven efficacy, precisely identifying suitable CRT candidates remains a challenge, with a notable proportion of patients experiencing non-response. Accordingly, many attempts have been made to enhance patient selection, and to identify the best imaging parameters to predict the response and survival after CRT implantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Left bundle branch block - innocent bystander, silent menace, or both.

Heart Rhythm

December 2024

Christian-Albrechts-University, Medical Faculty, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany; University of Applied Science, Life Sciences, An der Karlstadt 8, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany. Electronic address:

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) causes immediate electrical and mechanical dys-synchrony of the left ventricle (LV) and gradual structural damages in the Purkinje cells and myocardium. Mechanical dys-synchrony reduces the LV ejection fraction (EF) instantly, but only to ≈55% in an otherwise normal heart. Because of the heart's in-built functional redundancy, a patient with LBBB does not always notice the heart's reduced efficiency straight away.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Existing techniques for pacing the right ventricle and providing cardiac resynchronization therapy through biventricular pacing are not effective in restoring damage to the conduction system. Therefore, the need for new pacing modalities and techniques with more sensible designs and algorithms is justified. Although the benefits of conduction system pacing (CSP), which mainly include His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), are evident in patients who require conduction system recuperation, the critical criteria for left CSP remain unclear, and the roles of different pacing modalities of CSP for cardiac resynchronization are not definite.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!