Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Based on a retrospective study of 413 patients, the accuracy of sonography compared to CT, laparoscopy, biopsy and scintigraphy in the primary diagnosis of liver masses is shown. False positive sonographic reports are analysed in retrospect. 190 of 338 solid space-occupying growths of the liver have sonographically been called definite growths and 148 have been considered suspicious of being such growths. 49 of the cystic lesions were considered definitely cystic and 26 suspicious. Sonography made correct positive diagnoses in 91.8% of the cysts and in 88.9% of the solid growths. The diagnostic accuracy of solid growths (without further specification) was 90%. Among the sonographically suspicious ones the specific diagnosis was correct in 80.8% of the cystic lesions and in 44.5% of the solid lesions and a correct diagnosis without further specification was made in 55.4%. The majority of false positive diagnoses corresponded to normal findings in other methods. The number of false positive diagnoses in sonography in contrast to CT depends to a high degree on the experience of the physician. Before the use of other more invasive methods the sonographically suspicious findings should therefore be double-checked by an experienced colleague with several years of sonographic experience.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!