Introduction: This study evaluated the real-world clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of the ThermoCool Surround Flow (SF) and ThermoCool catheters in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.
Methods: Adults with AF who underwent catheter ablation between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, in a hospital outpatient setting were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database. Using a search strategy of hospital-charge descriptors, patients were classified into two mutually exclusive groups: ThermoCool SF catheter and ThermoCool catheter. A generalized estimating equation was used to compare index admission cost. Survey logistic regression was used to compare the incidence of inpatient readmission, direct-current cardioversion (DCCV), and repeat ablation. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for hospital clustering and demographic, procedural, hospital, and comorbidity characteristics.
Results: There were 1,014 and 463 patients in the ThermoCool SF and ThermoCool groups, respectively. The ThermoCool SF group had significantly lower odds of all-cause (odds ratio [OR] 0.45; 95% CI 0.27-0.76) and cardiovascular-related readmissions (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.96), and DCCV (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42-0.88) than the ThermoCool group. In patients susceptible to fluid overload, the ThermoCool SF group had significantly lower odds of 12-month all-cause (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23-0.75), cardiovascular-related (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.92), and AF-related readmissions (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.80), and DCCV (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31-0.87) than the ThermoCool group.
Conclusions: Using the ThermoCool SF catheter for AF ablation was significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with the ThermoCool catheter.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181087 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S180125 | DOI Listing |
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
December 2024
Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium (T.P., P.K., N.A., J.V.).
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising treatment for atrial fibrillation. We report 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia outcomes using monopolar PFA delivered through 3 commercial, contact force-sensing focal catheters.
Methods: ECLIPSE AF (NCT04523545) was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study evaluating acute and chronic safety and performance using the CENTAURI system to deliver focal PFA with TactiCath SE, StablePoint, and ThermoCool ST.
J Comp Eff Res
January 2025
MedTech Epidemiology & Real-World Data Science, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) is a mainstay treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). RF catheters with contact force (CF) sensing technology and electroanatomical mapping systems enable real-time assessment of catheter tip-tissue interface CF, facilitating individualized and precise CA. This study examined inpatient hospital readmissions in patients with AF treated with THERMOCOOL™ ST/ THERMOCOOL™ STSF catheter with the CARTO™ 3 System versus TactiCath™ catheter with the EnSite™ System.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
November 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
August 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (H.N., M.S., A.A.H., S.N., P.S., W.I.S., O.M.W.).
Heart Vessels
November 2024
Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!